TSEC vs. FCSH
TSEC (Touchstone Securitized Income ETF) and FCSH (Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSEC returned 6.00% vs 4.30% for FCSH. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSEC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for FCSH.
Performance
TSEC vs. FCSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSEC achieves a 1.28% return, which is significantly higher than FCSH's 0.65% return.
TSEC
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 6.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCSH
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSEC vs. FCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSEC Touchstone Securitized Income ETF | 1.28% | 7.47% | 7.62% | 5.00% |
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF | 0.65% | 6.42% | 4.66% | 3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSEC and FCSH is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSEC vs. FCSH — Risk / Return Rank
TSEC
FCSH
TSEC vs. FCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC) and Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSEC | FCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 2.21 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.25 | 3.44 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.44 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 3.44 | +0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.59 | 12.26 | -0.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSEC | FCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 2.21 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.59 | 0.86 | +1.73 |
Drawdowns
TSEC vs. FCSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSEC drawdown since its inception was -1.78%, smaller than the maximum FCSH drawdown of -8.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSEC and FCSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSEC | FCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -8.47% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.67% | -1.24% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.49% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.33% | -2.21% | +1.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.35% | +0.16% |
Volatility
TSEC vs. FCSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC) is 0.55%, while Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF (FCSH) has a volatility of 0.61%. This indicates that TSEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSEC | FCSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.55% | 0.61% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.07% | 1.53% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70% | 1.95% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.90% | 2.90% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.90% | 2.90% | 0.00% |
TSEC vs. FCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSEC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FCSH's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSEC vs. FCSH - Dividend Comparison
TSEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, more than FCSH's 4.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCSH Federated Hermes Short Duration Corporate ETF | 4.08% | 4.14% | 4.44% | 2.31% | 1.76% | 0.04% |
TSEC Touchstone Securitized Income ETF | 7.30% | 6.47% | 5.83% | 2.86% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSEC and FCSH have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCSH has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to TSEC (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSEC dropped -1.78% vs FCSH's -8.47%.
On 1-year performance, TSEC leads with 6.00% vs 4.30% for FCSH. On fees, FCSH is cheaper at 0.30% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSEC has performed better with a 6.00% return vs 4.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCSH is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TSEC.
TSEC has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 4.08% for FCSH.
They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Federated. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TSEC and 0.30% for FCSH.
TSEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSEC and FCSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer