TSDD vs. SPDN
TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and SPDN (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSDD is actively managed, while SPDN is passively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -62.72% vs -12.83% for SPDN. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSDD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SPDN.
Performance
TSDD vs. SPDN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly higher than SPDN's -7.28% return.
TSDD
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -62.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPDN
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- 6M
- -5.88%
- YTD
- -7.28%
- 1Y
- -12.83%
- 3Y*
- -11.38%
- 5Y*
- -8.18%
- 10Y*
- -12.26%
TSDD vs. SPDN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -2.07% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | -7.28% | -11.09% | -12.88% | -6.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSDD and SPDN is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | 0.56 |
The correlation between TSDD and SPDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSDD vs. SPDN — Risk / Return Rank
TSDD
SPDN
TSDD vs. SPDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSDD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.84 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.90 | -0.81 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | -1.54 | +0.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSDD vs. SPDN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than SPDN's maximum drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and SPDN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSDD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -75.31% | -23.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.48% | -15.93% | -53.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.88% | -75.03% | -23.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.14% | -48.80% | -23.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.77% | 8.34% | +46.43% |
Volatility
TSDD vs. SPDN - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 34.42% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares (SPDN) at 3.87%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSDD | SPDN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.42% | 3.87% | +30.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.90% | 10.06% | +52.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 89.44% | 12.71% | +76.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.59% | 16.97% | +97.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.59% | 18.01% | +96.58% |
TSDD vs. SPDN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSDD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSDD vs. SPDN - Dividend Comparison
TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, more than SPDN's 3.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPDN Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1x Shares | 3.35% | 4.06% | 5.32% | 5.84% | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.10% | 1.89% | 1.24% | 0.42% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.60% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSDD and SPDN have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (34.42%) compared to SPDN (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs SPDN's -75.31%.
On 1-year performance, SPDN leads with -12.83% vs -62.72% for TSDD. On fees, SPDN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SPDN has been the lower-risk option at 3.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPDN has performed better with a -12.83% return vs -62.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPDN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.60%, compared with 3.35% for SPDN.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TSDD and 0.50% for SPDN.
TSDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSDD and SPDN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer