TSDD vs. NFXS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and NFXS (Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -62.89% vs 43.26% for NFXS. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSDD charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for NFXS.

Performance

TSDD vs. NFXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than NFXS's 11.23% return.

TSDD

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: -17.41%
• YTD: -4.27%
• 6M: -7.92%
• 1Y: -62.89%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NFXS

• 1D: 2.15%
• 1M: 11.52%
• YTD: 11.23%
• 6M: 23.05%
• 1Y: 43.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSDD vs. NFXS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	-4.27%	-74.84%	-78.21%
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	11.23%	-8.56%	-21.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TSDD and NFXS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2024	0.23

Over the past year, the correlation between TSDD and NFXS has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.23, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TSDD vs. NFXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSDD

TSDD Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
TSDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TSDD Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TSDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
TSDD Martin Ratio Rank: 4

NFXS

NFXS Risk / Return Rank: 35
NFXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
NFXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
NFXS Omega Ratio Rank: 42
NFXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
NFXS Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSDD vs. NFXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSDD	NFXS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	1.31	-1.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.87	1.90	-2.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.27	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	1.39	-2.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.05	3.81	-4.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSDD vs. NFXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSDD Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the NFXS Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSDD and NFXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSDD	NFXS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.68	1.31	-1.99
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.66	-0.36	-0.30

Drawdowns

TSDD vs. NFXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than NFXS's maximum drawdown of -50.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and NFXS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSDD	NFXS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.03%	-50.37%	-48.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-76.12%	-31.31%	-44.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.90%	-21.98%	-76.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.21%	-32.39%	-38.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	59.88%	11.39%	+48.49%

Volatility

TSDD vs. NFXS - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 24.19% compared to Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares (NFXS) at 7.23%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSDD	NFXS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.19%	7.23%	+16.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.90%	26.37%	+28.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.57%	33.13%	+59.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	114.46%	34.68%	+79.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	114.46%	34.68%	+79.78%

TSDD vs. NFXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NFXS's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSDD vs. NFXS - Dividend Comparison

TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than NFXS's 2.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NFXS Direxion Daily NFLX Bear 1X Shares	2.81%	3.53%	0.87%	0.00%
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF	8.80%	8.42%	0.00%	24.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSDD and NFXS in my portfolio?

TSDD and NFXS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSDD or NFXS?

TSDD has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to NFXS (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs NFXS's -50.37%.

Which ETF is better, TSDD or NFXS?

On 1-year performance, NFXS leads with 43.26% vs -62.89% for TSDD. On fees, NFXS is cheaper at 1.03% per year. On volatility, NFXS has been the lower-risk option at 7.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSDD or NFXS?

Over the 1-year period, NFXS has performed better with a 43.26% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSDD or NFXS?

NFXS is cheaper with a 1.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSDD or NFXS?

TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 2.81% for NFXS.

What is the main difference between TSDD and NFXS?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSDD and 1.03% for NFXS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NFXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.