TSDD vs. CARD
TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSDD is actively managed, while CARD is passively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -54.15% vs -35.50% for CARD. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSDD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
TSDD vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than CARD's 4.05% return.
TSDD
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 26.86%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 35.71%
- 1Y
- -54.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARD
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 16.62%
- 1Y
- -35.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 16.69% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 4.05% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -25.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSDD and CARD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2023 | 0.63 |
The correlation between TSDD and CARD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSDD vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
TSDD
CARD
TSDD vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSDD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 0.96 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | -0.77 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | -1.14 | +0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSDD vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSDD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -93.51% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.39% | -46.11% | -26.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.66% | -92.18% | -6.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.69% | -68.77% | -2.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.75% | 31.66% | +25.09% |
Volatility
TSDD vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 27.02% compared to Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) at 23.66%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSDD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.02% | 23.66% | +3.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.73% | 52.57% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.65% | 70.15% | +17.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.18% | 80.64% | +33.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.18% | 80.64% | +33.54% |
TSDD vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSDD vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.22%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 7.22% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSDD and CARD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (27.02%) compared to CARD (23.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs CARD's -93.51%.
On 1-year performance, CARD leads with -35.50% vs -54.15% for TSDD. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CARD has been the lower-risk option at 23.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CARD has performed better with a -35.50% return vs -54.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 7.22%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSDD and 0.95% for CARD.
CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSDD and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer