TSDD vs. CARD
TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds. TSDD is actively managed, while CARD is passively managed. Over the past year, TSDD returned -62.89% vs -35.78% for CARD. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TSDD charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for CARD.
Performance
TSDD vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSDD achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's -2.60% return.
TSDD
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -17.41%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 6M
- -7.92%
- 1Y
- -62.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARD
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -13.67%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -35.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSDD vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | -4.27% | -74.84% | -89.21% | -20.49% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -2.60% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -29.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSDD and CARD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2023 | 0.63 |
The correlation between TSDD and CARD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSDD vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
TSDD
CARD
TSDD vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSDD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.95 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.83 | -0.72 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | -1.06 | +0.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSDD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.68 | -0.52 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.66 | -0.65 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
TSDD vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSDD drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSDD and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSDD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.03% | -93.51% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.12% | -49.57% | -26.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.90% | -92.68% | -6.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.21% | -68.13% | -3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 59.88% | 33.93% | +25.95% |
Volatility
TSDD vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) has a higher volatility of 24.19% compared to Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) at 22.80%. This indicates that TSDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSDD | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.19% | 22.80% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.90% | 50.05% | +4.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.57% | 68.70% | +23.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 114.46% | 80.53% | +33.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 114.46% | 80.53% | +33.93% |
TSDD vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSDD vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 8.80% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSDD and CARD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSDD has higher volatility (24.19%) compared to CARD (22.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSDD dropped -99.03% vs CARD's -93.51%.
On 1-year performance, CARD leads with -35.78% vs -62.89% for TSDD. On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, CARD has been the lower-risk option at 22.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CARD has performed better with a -35.78% return vs -62.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSDD.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 8.80%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for TSDD and 0.95% for CARD.
CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSDD and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer