TSCFY vs. SCBFY
TSCFY (TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR) and SCBFY (Standard Chartered PLC) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — TSCFY in Banks - Regional, SCBFY in Banks - Diversified. Over the past 5 years, TSCFY returned 8.21%/yr vs 34.49%/yr for SCBFY. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSCFY vs. SCBFY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCFY achieves a 6.14% return, which is significantly lower than SCBFY's 12.99% return.
TSCFY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 6.14%
- 6M
- 6.14%
- 1Y
- 8.34%
- 3Y*
- 12.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.21%
- 10Y*
- —
SCBFY
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 7.19%
- YTD
- 12.99%
- 6M
- 24.66%
- 1Y
- 81.93%
- 3Y*
- 52.69%
- 5Y*
- 34.49%
- 10Y*
- —
TSCFY vs. SCBFY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCFY TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR | 6.14% | 26.78% | 3.89% | 21.46% | -7.61% | 14.98% | -11.36% | 0.00% |
SCBFY Standard Chartered PLC | 12.99% | 103.24% | 52.51% | 15.76% | 23.36% | -2.07% | -31.49% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCFY and SCBFY is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2019 | 0.00 |
Fundamentals
TSCFY:
$2.44B
SCBFY:
$62.91B
TSCFY:
$153.88
SCBFY:
$4.55
TSCFY:
0.20
SCBFY:
11.99
TSCFY:
0.00
SCBFY:
0.35
TSCFY:
0.05
SCBFY:
1.83
TSCFY:
$24.99B
SCBFY:
$35.24B
TSCFY:
$18.18B
SCBFY:
$21.49B
TSCFY:
$8.92B
SCBFY:
$7.89B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCFY vs. SCBFY — Risk / Return Rank
TSCFY
SCBFY
TSCFY vs. SCBFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR (TSCFY) and Standard Chartered PLC (SCBFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSCFY | SCBFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 2.59 | -2.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.78 | 3.19 | -2.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.42 | -0.24 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 3.75 | -2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.30 | 12.68 | -2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSCFY | SCBFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 2.59 | -2.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.96 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.60 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
TSCFY vs. SCBFY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCFY drawdown since its inception was -34.84%, smaller than the maximum SCBFY drawdown of -55.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCFY and SCBFY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCFY | SCBFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.84% | -55.18% | +20.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.77% | -21.98% | +17.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.65% | -28.20% | +14.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.96% | -28.20% | +14.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.52% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.59% | -18.16% | +9.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.81% | 6.48% | -5.67% |
Volatility
TSCFY vs. SCBFY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR (TSCFY) is 0.00%, while Standard Chartered PLC (SCBFY) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that TSCFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCBFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCFY | SCBFY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 11.44% | -11.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.42% | 26.26% | -12.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.75% | 31.85% | -12.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 36.06% | -12.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.86% | 40.30% | +5.56% |
Dividends
TSCFY vs. SCBFY - Dividend Comparison
TSCFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.81%, more than SCBFY's 2.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCBFY Standard Chartered PLC | 2.25% | 1.63% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 1.66% | 1.96% | 2.75% |
TSCFY TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR | 7.81% | 7.59% | 8.41% | 10.36% | 8.63% | 7.21% | 7.92% |
Financials
TSCFY vs. SCBFY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR and Standard Chartered PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TSCFY vs. SCBFY - Profitability Comparison
TSCFY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR reported a gross profit of 4.66B and revenue of 6.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.7%.
SCBFY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Standard Chartered PLC reported a gross profit of 5.90B and revenue of 10.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.1%.
TSCFY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR reported an operating income of 2.23B and revenue of 6.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.4%.
SCBFY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Standard Chartered PLC reported an operating income of 2.45B and revenue of 10.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.
TSCFY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, TISCO Financial Group PCL ADR reported a net income of 1.79B and revenue of 6.49B, resulting in a net margin of 27.6%.
SCBFY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Standard Chartered PLC reported a net income of 1.90B and revenue of 10.16B, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCFY and SCBFY have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCBFY has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to TSCFY (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCFY dropped -34.84% vs SCBFY's -55.18%.
SCBFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSCFY and SCBFY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer