PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SCBFY vs. MRK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SCBFY vs. MRK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Standard Chartered PLC (SCBFY) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SCBFY achieves a 12.99% return, which is significantly higher than MRK's 9.78% return.


SCBFY

1D
-3.52%
1M
7.19%
YTD
12.99%
6M
24.66%
1Y
81.93%
3Y*
52.69%
5Y*
34.49%
10Y*

MRK

1D
-0.82%
1M
1.41%
YTD
9.78%
6M
13.95%
1Y
54.09%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
11.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SCBFY vs. MRK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SCBFY
Standard Chartered PLC
12.99%103.24%52.51%15.76%23.36%-2.07%-31.49%22.37%
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
9.78%9.79%-6.26%1.01%49.42%1.75%-7.20%9.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SCBFY and MRK is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2019

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SCBFY:

$62.91B

MRK:

$283.54B

EPS

SCBFY:

$4.55

MRK:

$3.58

PE Ratio

SCBFY:

11.99

MRK:

32.00

PEG Ratio

SCBFY:

0.35

MRK:

0.03

PS Ratio

SCBFY:

1.83

MRK:

4.36

PB Ratio

SCBFY:

1.16

MRK:

6.18

Total Revenue (TTM)

SCBFY:

$35.24B

MRK:

$65.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SCBFY:

$21.49B

MRK:

$49.79B

EBITDA (TTM)

SCBFY:

$7.89B

MRK:

$22.69B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SCBFY vs. MRK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCBFY
SCBFY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SCBFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCBFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCBFY Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
SCBFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCBFY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

MRK
MRK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRK Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRK Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SCBFY vs. MRK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Standard Chartered PLC (SCBFY) and Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SCBFYMRKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.59

2.02

+0.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.19

2.94

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

4.78

-1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.68

12.00

+0.68

SCBFY vs. MRK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SCBFY Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the MRK Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SCBFY and MRK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SCBFYMRKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

2.02

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.54

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.48

+0.12

Drawdowns

SCBFY vs. MRK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SCBFY drawdown since its inception was -55.18%, smaller than the maximum MRK drawdown of -68.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SCBFY and MRK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SCBFYMRKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.18%

-68.61%

+13.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.98%

-11.37%

-10.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.20%

-43.44%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.20%

-43.44%

+15.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.52%

-8.50%

+4.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-18.84%

+0.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.48%

4.52%

+1.96%

Volatility

SCBFY vs. MRK - Volatility Comparison

Standard Chartered PLC (SCBFY) has a higher volatility of 11.44% compared to Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) at 8.21%. This indicates that SCBFY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SCBFYMRKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.44%

8.21%

+3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.26%

17.62%

+8.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

26.92%

+4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.06%

23.62%

+12.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.30%

22.91%

+17.39%

Dividends

SCBFY vs. MRK - Dividend Comparison

SCBFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than MRK's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.89%3.12%3.14%2.72%2.52%3.41%3.03%2.48%2.60%3.36%3.14%3.43%
SCBFY
Standard Chartered PLC
2.25%1.63%2.40%2.36%1.66%1.96%2.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

SCBFY vs. MRK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Standard Chartered PLC and Merck & Co., Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
10.16B
16.29B
(SCBFY) Total Revenue
(MRK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SCBFY vs. MRK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Standard Chartered PLC and Merck & Co., Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
58.1%
81.9%
Portfolio components
SCBFY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Standard Chartered PLC reported a gross profit of 5.90B and revenue of 10.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.1%.

MRK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.34B and revenue of 16.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

SCBFY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Standard Chartered PLC reported an operating income of 2.45B and revenue of 10.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.

MRK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported an operating income of -1.88B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in an operating margin of -11.6%.

SCBFY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Standard Chartered PLC reported a net income of 1.90B and revenue of 10.16B, resulting in a net margin of 18.7%.

MRK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Merck & Co., Inc. reported a net income of -4.24B and revenue of 16.29B, resulting in a net margin of -26.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SCBFY and MRK have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCBFY has higher volatility (11.44%) compared to MRK (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SCBFY dropped -55.18% vs MRK's -68.61%.

SCBFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SCBFY and MRK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer