TSCDY vs. ABBV
TSCDY (Tesco PLC) and ABBV (AbbVie Inc.) are both stocks. TSCDY operates in Grocery Stores (Consumer Defensive), while ABBV operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, TSCDY returned 16.93%/yr vs 19.22%/yr for ABBV. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSCDY vs. ABBV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSCDY achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than ABBV's 2.32% return. Over the past 10 years, TSCDY has underperformed ABBV with an annualized return of 16.93%, while ABBV has yielded a comparatively higher 19.22% annualized return.
TSCDY
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 11.36%
- 3Y*
- 27.81%
- 5Y*
- 18.14%
- 10Y*
- 16.93%
ABBV
- 1D
- 6.25%
- 1M
- 6.63%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 28.17%
- 3Y*
- 23.52%
- 5Y*
- 19.47%
- 10Y*
- 19.22%
TSCDY vs. ABBV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSCDY Tesco PLC | 0.70% | 32.85% | 30.49% | 43.52% | -29.02% | 65.48% | 0.16% | 41.74% | -12.38% | 12.46% |
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 2.32% | 33.08% | 18.86% | -0.23% | 24.01% | 32.43% | 27.72% | 1.47% | -0.96% | 60.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSCDY and ABBV is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.17 |
The correlation between TSCDY and ABBV shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.17 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TSCDY:
$37.63B
ABBV:
$408.04B
TSCDY:
£1.61
ABBV:
$2.05
TSCDY:
8.33
ABBV:
112.07
TSCDY:
0.20
ABBV:
6.49
TSCDY:
2.48
ABBV:
14.84
TSCDY:
£143.57B
ABBV:
$62.82B
TSCDY:
£10.62B
ABBV:
$46.15B
TSCDY:
£9.46B
ABBV:
$17.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSCDY vs. ABBV — Risk / Return Rank
TSCDY
ABBV
TSCDY vs. ABBV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tesco PLC (TSCDY) and AbbVie Inc. (ABBV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSCDY | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.21 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 1.63 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | 3.63 | -1.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSCDY vs. ABBV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSCDY drawdown since its inception was -76.10%, which is greater than ABBV's maximum drawdown of -45.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSCDY and ABBV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSCDY | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.10% | -45.09% | -31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.25% | -17.32% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.37% | -20.74% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.56% | -21.92% | -23.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.56% | -45.09% | -0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.45% | -3.65% | -7.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.78% | -10.71% | -32.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.63% | 7.78% | -2.15% |
Volatility
TSCDY vs. ABBV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tesco PLC (TSCDY) is 7.47%, while AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that TSCDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABBV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSCDY | ABBV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 9.13% | -1.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.40% | 19.02% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.92% | 25.21% | -2.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 23.11% | +0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.77% | 25.83% | +1.94% |
Dividends
TSCDY vs. ABBV - Dividend Comparison
TSCDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than ABBV's 2.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABBV AbbVie Inc. | 2.93% | 2.87% | 3.49% | 3.82% | 3.49% | 3.84% | 4.41% | 4.83% | 3.89% | 2.65% | 3.64% | 3.41% |
TSCDY Tesco PLC | 3.00% | 3.08% | 3.39% | 3.60% | 5.27% | 20.15% | 3.79% | 2.56% | 2.05% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
TSCDY vs. ABBV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tesco PLC and AbbVie Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TSCDY vs. ABBV - Profitability Comparison
TSCDY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported a gross profit of 2.75B and revenue of 37.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.3%.
ABBV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.53B and revenue of 15.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.5%.
TSCDY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported an operating income of 1.49B and revenue of 37.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
ABBV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported an operating income of 4.73B and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.
TSCDY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tesco PLC reported a net income of 835.66M and revenue of 37.62B, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
ABBV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, AbbVie Inc. reported a net income of 699.00M and revenue of 15.00B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TSCDY and ABBV have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABBV has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to TSCDY (7.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSCDY dropped -76.10% vs ABBV's -45.09%.
ABBV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSCDY and ABBV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer