PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TSBIX vs. DFESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TSBIX vs. DFESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX) and DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio (DFESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSBIX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than DFESX's 28.96% return. Over the past 10 years, TSBIX has underperformed DFESX with an annualized return of 2.12%, while DFESX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.15% annualized return.


TSBIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.47%
YTD
0.68%
6M
0.98%
1Y
6.46%
3Y*
5.32%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
2.12%

DFESX

1D
0.85%
1M
10.14%
YTD
28.96%
6M
31.90%
1Y
54.42%
3Y*
24.24%
5Y*
9.44%
10Y*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSBIX vs. DFESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TSBIX
TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class
0.68%8.69%3.32%6.05%-14.43%-1.03%7.43%8.94%0.08%4.52%
DFESX
DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio
28.96%29.95%7.16%14.58%-18.49%4.16%12.99%17.12%-14.87%37.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TSBIX and DFESX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2012

-0.05

The correlation between TSBIX and DFESX shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (all time) to 0.16 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TSBIX vs. DFESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSBIX
TSBIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TSBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
TSBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DFESX
DFESX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DFESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFESX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DFESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFESX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSBIX vs. DFESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX) and DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio (DFESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TSBIXDFESXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.64

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

4.33

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

17.30

-10.50

TSBIX vs. DFESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the DFESX Sharpe Ratio of 3.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSBIX and DFESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TSBIXDFESXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

3.39

-1.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

0.63

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.70

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.50

+0.07

Drawdowns

TSBIX vs. DFESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSBIX drawdown since its inception was -19.21%, smaller than the maximum DFESX drawdown of -41.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSBIX and DFESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TSBIXDFESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.21%

-41.43%

+22.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.87%

-12.79%

+9.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.11%

-16.53%

+10.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.21%

-32.64%

+13.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.21%

-41.43%

+22.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

0.00%

-1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.56%

-10.76%

+7.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

3.18%

-2.23%

Volatility

TSBIX vs. DFESX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX) is 1.34%, while DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio (DFESX) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that TSBIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TSBIXDFESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.34%

7.18%

-5.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.81%

14.26%

-11.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89%

16.35%

-12.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.83%

15.10%

-9.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

16.10%

-11.25%

TSBIX vs. DFESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSBIX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than DFESX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

TSBIX vs. DFESX - Dividend Comparison

TSBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than DFESX's 2.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFESX
DFA Investment Dimensions Group Inc - Emerging Markets Social Core Equity Portfolio
2.13%2.59%3.15%3.23%3.17%2.37%1.64%2.33%2.37%2.04%2.05%2.17%
TSBIX
TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class
4.72%5.38%5.10%3.77%2.31%1.69%4.56%3.68%2.63%2.45%3.19%2.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


TSBIX and DFESX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFESX has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to TSBIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSBIX dropped -19.21% vs DFESX's -41.43%.

DFESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TSBIX and DFESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer