PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRXAX vs. IPIRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRXAX vs. IPIRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio (IPIRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TRXAX

1D
0.60%
1M
-0.67%
6M
1.56%
YTD
5.95%
1Y
12.23%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
5.25%
10Y*
5.60%
ALL TIME*
5.62%

IPIRX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TRXAX vs. IPIRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRXAX
Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund
5.95%16.16%4.67%5.23%-7.44%9.65%3.62%11.51%-3.30%11.12%
IPIRX
Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio
6.84%14.21%7.31%10.65%-17.52%6.06%16.10%18.35%-9.87%15.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TRXAX and IPIRX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.79

The correlation between TRXAX and IPIRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRXAX vs. IPIRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRXAX
TRXAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TRXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
TRXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

IPIRX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRXAX vs. IPIRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio (IPIRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRXAXIPIRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

TRXAX vs. IPIRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRXAX vs. IPIRX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRXAXIPIRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

Volatility

TRXAX vs. IPIRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRXAXIPIRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.20%

TRXAX vs. IPIRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRXAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than IPIRX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRXAX vs. IPIRX - Dividend Comparison

TRXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than IPIRX's 39.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPIRX
Voya Global Perspectives Portfolio
39.58%5.64%3.25%14.65%13.55%6.34%6.25%7.80%1.30%2.78%2.78%7.16%
TRXAX
Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund
2.14%2.45%4.93%5.12%0.83%6.76%1.91%2.66%8.34%3.46%3.55%1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRXAX and IPIRX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRXAX and IPIRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer