TRXAX vs. IAU
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU).
TRXAX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Jul 28, 2011. IAU is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold Price. It was launched on Jan 21, 2005.
Performance
TRXAX vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRXAX vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund | 2.23% | 16.16% | 4.67% | 5.23% | -7.44% | 9.65% | 3.62% | 11.51% | -3.30% | 11.12% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 8.61% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRXAX achieves a 2.23% return, which is significantly lower than IAU's 8.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TRXAX has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 5.41%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 14.08% annualized return.
TRXAX
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- 2.23%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- 1Y
- 14.48%
- 3Y*
- 7.99%
- 5Y*
- 4.90%
- 10Y*
- 5.41%
IAU
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -11.01%
- YTD
- 8.61%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- 1Y
- 49.53%
- 3Y*
- 33.12%
- 5Y*
- 21.78%
- 10Y*
- 14.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRXAX vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRXAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRXAX vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
TRXAX
IAU
TRXAX vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRXAX | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.98 | 1.80 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 2.24 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.33 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.55 | 2.69 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.37 | 9.97 | +0.40 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRXAX | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.80 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 1.24 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.89 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.64 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRXAX and IAU is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TRXAX vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
TRXAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRXAX Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund | 2.28% | 2.45% | 4.93% | 5.12% | 0.83% | 6.76% | 1.91% | 2.66% | 8.34% | 3.46% | 3.55% | 1.59% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TRXAX vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRXAX drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRXAX and IAU.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRXAX | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -45.14% | +24.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.60% | -19.18% | +13.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.03% | -20.93% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.50% | -21.82% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.20% | -13.20% | +8.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.67% | -15.98% | +13.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.38% | 5.18% | -3.80% |
Volatility
TRXAX vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund (TRXAX) is 2.51%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that TRXAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRXAX | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.51% | 11.02% | -8.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.86% | 24.11% | -19.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.42% | 27.62% | -20.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.88% | 17.69% | -9.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.26% | 15.82% | -7.56% |