TRVLX vs. FGIPX
TRVLX (T. Rowe Price Value Fund) and FGIPX (Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TRVLX returned 11.85%/yr vs 13.23%/yr for FGIPX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRVLX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FGIPX.
Performance
TRVLX vs. FGIPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRVLX achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly lower than FGIPX's 18.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TRVLX has underperformed FGIPX with an annualized return of 11.85%, while FGIPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.
TRVLX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 22.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 11.85%
FGIPX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 18.47%
- 6M
- 17.70%
- 1Y
- 43.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.71%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
TRVLX vs. FGIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRVLX T. Rowe Price Value Fund | 13.98% | 12.20% | 14.98% | 12.16% | -11.37% | 29.86% | 10.48% | 26.20% | -9.44% | 17.35% |
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class | 18.47% | 30.18% | 15.44% | 12.17% | 3.28% | 21.73% | -4.59% | 25.96% | -9.95% | 18.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRVLX and FGIPX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013 | 0.92 |
The correlation between TRVLX and FGIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRVLX vs. FGIPX — Risk / Return Rank
TRVLX
FGIPX
TRVLX vs. FGIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Value Fund (TRVLX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRVLX | FGIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.67 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.34 | 6.08 | -2.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.14 | 23.11 | -9.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRVLX vs. FGIPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRVLX drawdown since its inception was -60.22%, which is greater than FGIPX's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRVLX and FGIPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRVLX | FGIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.22% | -37.32% | -22.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.05% | -7.26% | +0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.01% | -13.27% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.35% | -16.19% | -4.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.65% | -37.32% | -1.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -1.34% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.50% | -4.16% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 1.90% | -0.12% |
Volatility
TRVLX vs. FGIPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Value Fund (TRVLX) is 3.49%, while Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that TRVLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRVLX | FGIPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 4.14% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.59% | 8.80% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.05% | 11.81% | -0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.24% | 14.93% | -0.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.37% | 17.14% | +0.23% |
TRVLX vs. FGIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRVLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIPX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRVLX vs. FGIPX - Dividend Comparison
TRVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than FGIPX's 9.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIPX Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class | 9.60% | 11.68% | 12.69% | 7.50% | 7.35% | 12.20% | 2.13% | 52.72% | 25.63% | 5.58% | 4.22% | 5.88% |
TRVLX T. Rowe Price Value Fund | 4.00% | 4.56% | 8.50% | 2.97% | 10.09% | 10.92% | 2.33% | 1.69% | 11.09% | 5.89% | 3.06% | 8.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRVLX and FGIPX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGIPX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to TRVLX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRVLX dropped -60.22% vs FGIPX's -37.32%.
FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRVLX and FGIPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer