PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRVC.DE vs. HSBA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRVC.DE vs. HSBA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Citigroup Inc (TRVC.DE) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRVC.DE is traded in EUR, while HSBA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the HSBA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRVC.DE achieves a 15.86% return, which is significantly lower than HSBA.L's 21.37% return. Over the past 10 years, TRVC.DE has underperformed HSBA.L with an annualized return of 13.59%, while HSBA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.68% annualized return.


TRVC.DE

1D
4.10%
1M
5.70%
YTD
15.86%
6M
25.81%
1Y
75.54%
3Y*
42.83%
5Y*
15.70%
10Y*
13.59%

HSBA.L

1D
-1.88%
1M
7.21%
YTD
21.37%
6M
32.75%
1Y
59.94%
3Y*
39.91%
5Y*
32.73%
10Y*
16.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRVC.DE vs. HSBA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRVC.DE
Citigroup Inc
15.86%52.97%49.52%14.82%-18.59%10.39%-27.32%56.30%-26.94%11.69%
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
21.37%49.55%41.22%34.94%13.73%30.89%-39.47%3.78%-12.15%18.67%

Correlation

The correlation between TRVC.DE and HSBA.L is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007

0.50

The correlation between TRVC.DE and HSBA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (3 years) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRVC.DE vs. HSBA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRVC.DE
TRVC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TRVC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRVC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRVC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
TRVC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRVC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HSBA.L
HSBA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSBA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRVC.DE vs. HSBA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Citigroup Inc (TRVC.DE) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRVC.DEHSBA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.15

3.89

+1.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.67

14.38

+1.29

TRVC.DE vs. HSBA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRVC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the HSBA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRVC.DE and HSBA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRVC.DEHSBA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.34

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

1.30

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.65

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.07

0.25

-0.31

Drawdowns

TRVC.DE vs. HSBA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRVC.DE drawdown since its inception was -98.67%, which is greater than HSBA.L's maximum drawdown of -70.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRVC.DE and HSBA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRVC.DEHSBA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.67%

-70.41%

-28.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.99%

-15.32%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.04%

-24.61%

-11.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.53%

-24.61%

-14.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.55%

-61.21%

+8.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.65%

-3.20%

-72.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.20%

-19.10%

-56.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

4.16%

+0.72%

Volatility

TRVC.DE vs. HSBA.L - Volatility Comparison

Citigroup Inc (TRVC.DE) and HSBC Holdings plc (HSBA.L) have volatilities of 8.13% and 7.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRVC.DEHSBA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.13%

7.95%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.85%

21.09%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.47%

25.49%

+3.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.80%

25.20%

+4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.02%

25.54%

+6.48%

Dividends

TRVC.DE vs. HSBA.L - Dividend Comparison

TRVC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than HSBA.L's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSBA.L
HSBC Holdings plc
4.11%4.29%7.16%6.80%4.11%3.54%0.00%6.79%5.83%5.18%5.79%6.12%
TRVC.DE
Citigroup Inc
1.53%1.77%2.56%3.53%3.96%2.76%3.96%0.55%0.48%1.15%0.57%0.26%

Financials

TRVC.DE vs. HSBA.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Citigroup Inc and HSBC Holdings plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. TRVC.DE values in EUR, HSBA.L values in GBp

Frequently Asked Questions


TRVC.DE and HSBA.L have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRVC.DE and HSBA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer