TRUT vs. IGM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. TRUT is actively managed, while IGM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRUT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IGM.

Performance

TRUT vs. IGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 25.30% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 31.32% return.

TRUT

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: 16.68%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 6M: 24.37%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGM

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 16.93%
• YTD: 31.32%
• 6M: 29.19%
• 1Y: 62.26%
• 3Y*: 39.18%
• 5Y*: 22.04%
• 10Y*: 25.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUT vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	25.30%	10.16%
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	31.32%	12.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUT and IGM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2025	0.94

Return for Risk

TRUT vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IGM

IGM Risk / Return Rank: 79
IGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
IGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
IGM Omega Ratio Rank: 81
IGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
IGM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRUT vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRUT	IGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	3.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.39	0.48	+1.91

Drawdowns

TRUT vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and IGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRUT	IGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.55%	-65.59%	+47.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.44%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.46%	-0.84%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.17%	-15.23%	+10.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRUT	IGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.10%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.08%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.53%	20.43%	+1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.53%	25.68%	-4.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.53%	24.54%	-3.01%

TRUT vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than IGM's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRUT vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison

TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, more than IGM's 0.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF	0.12%	0.17%	0.22%	0.33%	0.66%	0.16%	0.32%	0.50%	0.57%	0.57%	0.90%	0.79%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.19%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRUT and IGM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, TRUT and IGM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, TRUT or IGM?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRUT or IGM?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IGM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRUT or IGM?

TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.12% for IGM.

What is the main difference between TRUT and IGM?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.46% for IGM.