TRUT vs. CHPS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TRUT (Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF) and CHPS (Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRUT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by VanEck, while CHPS is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Solactive Semiconductor ESG Screened Index. TRUT is actively managed, while CHPS is passively managed. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRUT charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CHPS.

Performance

TRUT vs. CHPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRUT achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly lower than CHPS's 107.68% return.

TRUT

• 1D: -3.32%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: 16.13%
• 6M: 14.91%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPS

• 1D: -8.79%
• 1M: 14.08%
• YTD: 107.68%
• 6M: 109.36%
• 1Y: 199.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRUT vs. CHPS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	16.13%	9.76%
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	107.68%	37.75%

Correlation

The correlation between TRUT and CHPS is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2025	0.76

Return for Risk

TRUT vs. CHPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CHPS

CHPS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CHPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CHPS Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CHPS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRUT vs. CHPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT) and Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRUT	CHPS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	5.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	4.70	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.66	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	11.49	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	42.41	—

Drawdowns

TRUT vs. CHPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRUT drawdown since its inception was -18.55%, smaller than the maximum CHPS drawdown of -39.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUT and CHPS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRUT	CHPS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.55%	-39.44%	+20.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.67%	-8.79%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.27%	-9.08%	+3.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.73%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRUT	CHPS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	22.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.21%	39.81%	-16.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.21%	35.53%	-12.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.21%	35.53%	-12.32%

TRUT vs. CHPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRUT has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRUT vs. CHPS - Dividend Comparison

TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than CHPS's 0.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CHPS Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF	0.31%	0.68%	1.75%	0.36%
TRUT Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF	0.20%	0.14%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRUT and CHPS in my portfolio?

TRUT and CHPS have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRUT or CHPS?

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRUT or CHPS?

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CHPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRUT or CHPS?

CHPS has the higher dividend yield at 0.31%, compared with 0.20% for TRUT.

What is the main difference between TRUT and CHPS?

TRUT is categorized as Technology Equities, while CHPS is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for TRUT and 0.15% for CHPS.