TRULX vs. QIACX

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

TRULX (T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core) and QIACX (Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TRULX returned 13.33%/yr vs 16.94%/yr for QIACX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRULX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QIACX.

Performance

TRULX vs. QIACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRULX achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than QIACX's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, TRULX has underperformed QIACX with an annualized return of 13.33%, while QIACX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.94% annualized return.

TRULX

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.92%
• 6M: 7.23%
• YTD: 9.30%
• 1Y: 16.71%
• 3Y*: 18.90%
• 5Y*: 11.20%
• 10Y*: 13.33%

QIACX

• 1D: 0.91%
• 1M: 2.82%
• 6M: 7.41%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 1Y: 17.53%
• 3Y*: 23.62%
• 5Y*: 15.04%
• 10Y*: 16.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRULX vs. QIACX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRULX T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core	9.30%	12.80%	22.97%	22.61%	-15.14%	25.57%	15.57%	29.51%	-3.38%	19.85%
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	8.18%	21.15%	31.07%	23.52%	-14.16%	31.40%	21.95%	26.91%	-2.64%	21.07%

Correlation

The correlation between TRULX and QIACX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2009	0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between TRULX and QIACX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TRULX vs. QIACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRULX

TRULX Risk / Return Rank: 44
TRULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
TRULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
TRULX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
TRULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
TRULX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

QIACX

QIACX Risk / Return Rank: 51
QIACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QIACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
QIACX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QIACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
QIACX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRULX vs. QIACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) and Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRULX	QIACX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	1.48	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.15	-0.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.30	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	2.16	-0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.47	9.37	-0.90

TRULX vs. QIACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRULX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the QIACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRULX and QIACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRULX vs. QIACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRULX drawdown since its inception was -33.68%, smaller than the maximum QIACX drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRULX and QIACX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRULX	QIACX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.68%	-60.11%	+26.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.57%	-8.65%	+0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.23%	-19.41%	+2.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.91%	-23.05%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.68%	-36.47%	+2.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-9.26%	+5.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	1.99%	-0.04%

Volatility

TRULX vs. QIACX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) is 3.47%, while Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund (QIACX) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that TRULX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QIACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRULX	QIACX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.47%	3.93%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.96%	10.10%	-1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.31%	12.60%	-1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.02%	17.45%	-1.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	18.62%	-1.67%

TRULX vs. QIACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRULX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than QIACX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRULX vs. QIACX - Dividend Comparison

TRULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than QIACX's 4.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QIACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund	4.23%	4.58%	8.65%	1.40%	10.90%	17.44%	3.01%	3.34%	8.60%	0.69%	1.12%	1.25%
TRULX T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core	7.11%	7.77%	6.66%	0.45%	4.27%	7.28%	0.85%	3.55%	7.89%	2.10%	0.94%	5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRULX and QIACX in my portfolio?

TRULX and QIACX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRULX or QIACX?

QIACX has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to TRULX (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRULX dropped -33.68% vs QIACX's -60.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QIACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.