PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRULX vs. PRWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRULX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRULX achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, TRULX has outperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 13.47%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.22% annualized return.


TRULX

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.25%
YTD
8.51%
6M
8.00%
1Y
19.72%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
13.47%

PRWCX

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.53%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.62%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRULX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRULX
T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core
8.51%12.80%22.97%22.61%-15.14%25.57%15.57%29.51%-3.38%19.85%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
5.48%12.45%12.50%18.85%-12.00%18.45%18.13%24.62%0.63%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TRULX and PRWCX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2009

0.95

The correlation between TRULX and PRWCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.83 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRULX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRULX
TRULX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
TRULX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRULX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRULX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TRULX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRULX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWCX
PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRULX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRULXPRWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.33

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

10.19

+0.27

TRULX vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRULX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRULX and PRWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRULXPRWCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

1.97

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.69

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.88

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.91

-0.04

Drawdowns

TRULX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRULX drawdown since its inception was -33.68%, smaller than the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRULX and PRWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRULXPRWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.68%

-41.77%

+8.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.57%

-6.32%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-15.96%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.91%

-17.07%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.68%

-26.86%

-6.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.55%

-0.68%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-3.33%

-0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.44%

+0.46%

Volatility

TRULX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core (TRULX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 1.95%. This indicates that TRULX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRULXPRWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

1.95%

+0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

6.00%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.97%

7.46%

+3.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.96%

12.74%

+3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.99%

12.74%

+4.25%

TRULX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRULX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRULX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

TRULX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, less than PRWCX's 8.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
8.36%8.81%10.38%4.15%9.44%9.23%7.97%5.83%7.46%6.82%3.51%9.86%
TRULX
T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core
7.16%7.77%6.66%0.45%4.27%7.28%0.85%3.55%7.89%2.10%0.94%5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRULX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRULX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to PRWCX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRULX dropped -33.68% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.

PRWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRULX and PRWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer