TRUH vs. UNHW
TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) and UNHW (Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRUH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by VanEck, while UNHW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill Investments. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRUH vs. UNHW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TRUH
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 7.85%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UNHW
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 13.00%
- YTD
- 30.73%
- 6M
- 31.76%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRUH vs. UNHW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 9.58% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 65.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUH and UNHW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUH vs. UNHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH) and Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF (UNHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUH vs. UNHW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUH drawdown since its inception was -4.51%, smaller than the maximum UNHW drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUH and UNHW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.51% | -32.28% | +27.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.54% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -11.03% | +9.42% |
Volatility
TRUH vs. UNHW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUH | UNHW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 48.41% | -31.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 48.41% | -31.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.87% | 48.41% | -31.54% |
Dividends
TRUH vs. UNHW - Dividend Comparison
TRUH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNHW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UNHW Roundhill UNH WeeklyPay ETF | 18.25% | 2.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUH and UNHW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UNHW has the higher dividend yield at 18.25%, compared with 0.00% for TRUH.
TRUH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while UNHW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Roundhill Investments.
Find the right allocation for TRUH and UNHW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer