TRUF vs. HSBH
TRUF (VanEck Financials TruSector ETF) and HSBH (HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRUF charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for HSBH.
Performance
TRUF vs. HSBH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TRUF
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 4.55%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HSBH
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 2.85%
- YTD
- 25.64%
- 6M
- 25.58%
- 1Y
- 66.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRUF vs. HSBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 10.01% |
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF | 11.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRUF and HSBH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRUF vs. HSBH — Risk / Return Rank
TRUF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HSBH
TRUF vs. HSBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF) and HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF (HSBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRUF | HSBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.52 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRUF vs. HSBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRUF drawdown since its inception was -3.24%, smaller than the maximum HSBH drawdown of -14.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRUF and HSBH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRUF | HSBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -14.81% | +11.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -1.49% | +0.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.20% | -2.33% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.08% | — |
Volatility
TRUF vs. HSBH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRUF | HSBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.16% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 23.68% | -10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 22.84% | -9.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 22.84% | -9.67% |
TRUF vs. HSBH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRUF has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than HSBH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TRUF vs. HSBH - Dividend Comparison
TRUF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HSBH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
HSBH HSBC Holdings plc ADRhedged ETF | 2.36% |
TRUF VanEck Financials TruSector ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRUF and HSBH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUF is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUF is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for HSBH.
HSBH has the higher dividend yield at 2.36%, compared with 0.00% for TRUF.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TRUF and 0.19% for HSBH.
Find the right allocation for TRUF and HSBH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer