TRTY vs. CEFZ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TRTY (Cambria Trinity ETF) and CEFZ (RiverNorth Active Income ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. TRTY is passively managed, while CEFZ is actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRTY charges 0.44%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for CEFZ.

Performance

TRTY vs. CEFZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTY achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly higher than CEFZ's 3.57% return.

TRTY

• 1D: -1.75%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: 6.97%
• 6M: 6.31%
• 1Y: 19.33%
• 3Y*: 10.40%
• 5Y*: 5.67%
• 10Y*: —

CEFZ

• 1D: -0.97%
• 1M: -1.00%
• YTD: 3.57%
• 6M: 3.99%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTY vs. CEFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF	6.97%	10.31%
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF	3.57%	7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTY and CEFZ is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025	0.60

Return for Risk

TRTY vs. CEFZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTY

TRTY Risk / Return Rank: 67
TRTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
TRTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
TRTY Omega Ratio Rank: 68
TRTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
TRTY Martin Ratio Rank: 77

CEFZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTY vs. CEFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRTY	CEFZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.45	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.54	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.89	—	—

Drawdowns

TRTY vs. CEFZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTY drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, which is greater than CEFZ's maximum drawdown of -6.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTY and CEFZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRTY	CEFZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.35%	-6.66%	-15.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.25%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.45%	-2.23%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-1.21%	-2.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.39%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRTY	CEFZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.79%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.05%	10.46%	-0.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.61%	10.46%	+0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.43%	10.46%	-0.03%

TRTY vs. CEFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRTY has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFZ's 3.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRTY vs. CEFZ - Dividend Comparison

TRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than CEFZ's 8.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF	8.40%	4.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF	3.10%	2.86%	3.55%	3.24%	5.17%	4.52%	1.99%	2.64%	1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRTY and CEFZ in my portfolio?

TRTY and CEFZ have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRTY or CEFZ?

On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRTY or CEFZ?

TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for CEFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRTY or CEFZ?

CEFZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.40%, compared with 3.10% for TRTY.

What is the main difference between TRTY and CEFZ?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRTY and 3.36% for CEFZ.