TRTY vs. ARP
TRTY (Cambria Trinity ETF) and ARP (Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. TRTY is passively managed, while ARP is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TRTY returned 11.86%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for ARP. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRTY charges 0.44%/yr vs 1.42%/yr for ARP.
Performance
TRTY vs. ARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRTY achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly lower than ARP's 11.92% return.
TRTY
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 10.10%
- 6M
- 11.29%
- 1Y
- 23.79%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.91%
- 10Y*
- —
ARP
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- YTD
- 11.92%
- 6M
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRTY vs. ARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 10.10% | 16.35% | 3.89% | 3.97% | 1.01% |
ARP Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF | 11.92% | 18.33% | 13.79% | 3.66% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRTY and ARP is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2022 | 0.70 |
The correlation between TRTY and ARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TRTY vs. ARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TRTY
ARP
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
TRTY
ARP
Financial Services
TRTY
ARP
Industrials
TRTY
ARP
Basic Materials
TRTY
ARP
Real Estate
TRTY
ARP
Consumer Cyclical
TRTY
ARP
Technology
TRTY
ARP
Utilities
TRTY
ARP
Communication Services
TRTY
ARP
Consumer Defensive
TRTY
ARP
Healthcare
TRTY
ARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRTY vs. ARP — Risk / Return Rank
TRTY
ARP
TRTY vs. ARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) and Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRTY | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.50 | 2.05 | +0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.17 | 2.56 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.43 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 2.82 | +1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.99 | 10.70 | +7.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRTY | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.05 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 1.37 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
TRTY vs. ARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRTY drawdown since its inception was -22.35%, which is greater than ARP's maximum drawdown of -10.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTY and ARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRTY | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.35% | -10.13% | -12.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.49% | -10.13% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.25% | -10.13% | +0.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | 0.00% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -1.82% | -2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.33% | 2.67% | -1.34% |
Volatility
TRTY vs. ARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cambria Trinity ETF (TRTY) is 2.35%, while Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF (ARP) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that TRTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRTY | ARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 2.93% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.25% | 11.70% | -3.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.54% | 13.54% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 10.07% | +0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.41% | 10.07% | +0.34% |
TRTY vs. ARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRTY has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than ARP's 1.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRTY vs. ARP - Dividend Comparison
TRTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.01%, less than ARP's 5.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARP Pmv Adaptive Risk Parity ETF | 5.84% | 6.54% | 5.29% | 2.67% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRTY Cambria Trinity ETF | 3.01% | 2.86% | 3.55% | 3.24% | 5.17% | 4.52% | 1.99% | 2.64% | 1.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRTY and ARP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ARP has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to TRTY (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTY dropped -22.35% vs ARP's -10.13%.
On 3-year performance, ARP leads with 15.58% vs 11.86% for TRTY. On fees, TRTY is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, TRTY has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ARP has performed better with a 15.58% return vs 11.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TRTY is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.42% for ARP.
ARP has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 3.01% for TRTY.
They also come from different issuers: Cambria and PMV. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRTY and 1.42% for ARP.
TRTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRTY and ARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer