PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRTGX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRTGX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Target 2060 Fund (TRTGX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTGX achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly higher than TRLGX's 6.07% return. Over the past 10 years, TRTGX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.55% annualized return.


TRTGX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.64%
YTD
11.21%
6M
12.41%
1Y
25.75%
3Y*
18.39%
5Y*
8.80%
10Y*
11.15%

TRLGX

1D
1.05%
1M
5.86%
YTD
6.07%
6M
5.41%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
25.77%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
18.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTGX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRTGX
T. Rowe Price Target 2060 Fund
11.21%18.65%14.02%20.48%-19.56%17.04%16.62%25.06%-7.86%20.84%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
6.07%17.51%37.57%46.22%-35.26%23.24%39.57%28.51%4.35%37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTGX and TRLGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2014

0.86

The correlation between TRTGX and TRLGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRTGX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTGX
TRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLGX
TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTGX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2060 Fund (TRTGX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRTGXTRLGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.22

1.51

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.13

2.09

+1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.27

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.31

+1.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.56

4.15

+7.42

TRTGX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTGX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRTGXTRLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.51

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.58

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.86

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.58

+0.04

Drawdowns

TRTGX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTGX drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, smaller than the maximum TRLGX drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTGX and TRLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTGXTRLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.56%

-55.56%

+23.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-18.18%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-21.17%

+5.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

-40.44%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.56%

-40.44%

+7.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-8.68%

+3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

5.72%

-3.51%

Volatility

TRTGX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Target 2060 Fund (TRTGX) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) at 3.06%. This indicates that TRTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRTGXTRLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

3.06%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

12.32%

-2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.34%

15.59%

-3.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

22.38%

-7.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

21.75%

-6.18%

TRTGX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRTGX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRTGX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

TRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, less than TRLGX's 12.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
12.91%13.69%9.80%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%4.09%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%
TRTGX
T. Rowe Price Target 2060 Fund
3.77%4.19%2.23%2.72%4.90%3.23%0.78%4.03%5.44%2.90%2.54%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRTGX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRTGX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to TRLGX (3.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTGX dropped -32.56% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

TRTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRTGX and TRLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer