PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRTGX vs. FFSDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRTGX vs. FFSDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Target 2060 Fund (TRTGX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTGX achieves a 11.76% return, which is significantly lower than FFSDX's 13.87% return.


TRTGX

1D
0.49%
1M
4.69%
YTD
11.76%
6M
12.42%
1Y
26.07%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
11.21%

FFSDX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.12%
YTD
13.87%
6M
15.71%
1Y
31.37%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTGX vs. FFSDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRTGX
T. Rowe Price Target 2060 Fund
11.76%18.65%14.02%20.48%-19.56%17.04%16.62%7.60%
FFSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K
13.87%23.80%14.16%20.69%-18.22%16.59%18.26%9.09%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTGX and FFSDX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.94

The correlation between TRTGX and FFSDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRTGX vs. FFSDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTGX
TRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FFSDX
FFSDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTGX vs. FFSDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2060 Fund (TRTGX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRTGXFFSDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.46

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.24

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

14.47

-2.27

TRTGX vs. FFSDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is comparable to the FFSDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTGX and FFSDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRTGXFFSDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

2.48

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.70

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.79

-0.17

Drawdowns

TRTGX vs. FFSDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTGX drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, roughly equal to the maximum FFSDX drawdown of -31.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTGX and FFSDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTGXFFSDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.56%

-31.03%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-9.80%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.06%

-15.40%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.34%

-27.29%

-1.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-5.87%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.19%

+0.02%

Volatility

TRTGX vs. FFSDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Target 2060 Fund (TRTGX) is 3.60%, while Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that TRTGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRTGXFFSDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.27%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

10.56%

-0.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

12.81%

-0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.29%

15.05%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.57%

17.03%

-1.46%

TRTGX vs. FFSDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRTGX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FFSDX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRTGX vs. FFSDX - Dividend Comparison

TRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, less than FFSDX's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K
4.91%3.68%2.75%2.15%8.83%7.86%2.31%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRTGX
T. Rowe Price Target 2060 Fund
3.75%4.19%2.23%2.72%4.90%3.23%0.78%4.03%5.44%2.90%2.54%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TRTGX and FFSDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSDX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to TRTGX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTGX dropped -32.56% vs FFSDX's -31.03%.

FFSDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRTGX and FFSDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer