TRSY vs. SCHQ

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TRSY (Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF) and SCHQ (Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - TRSY tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index while SCHQ tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TRSY returned 3.78% vs -1.68% for SCHQ. Their 0.09 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TRSY charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHQ.

Performance

TRSY vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF (TRSY) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRSY achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly higher than SCHQ's -3.25% return.

TRSY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• 6M: 1.78%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 1Y: 3.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.31%

SCHQ

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -3.51%
• 6M: -3.16%
• YTD: -3.25%
• 1Y: -1.68%
• 3Y*: -0.63%
• 5Y*: -7.05%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -4.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	$12.09M	$14.21M	$18.95M
TRSY Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF	$2.06M	$1.33M	$1.09M

TRSY vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
TRSY Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF	2.03%	4.22%	1.49%
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	-3.25%	5.50%	-6.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSY and SCHQ is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2024	0.09

Return for Risk

TRSY vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRSY

TRSY Risk / Return Rank: 99
TRSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TRSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
TRSY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
TRSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
TRSY Martin Ratio Rank: 100

SCHQ

SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 10
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 9
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRSY vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF (TRSY) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRSY	SCHQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.99	-0.04	+10.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	26.69	0.01	+26.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	6.33	1.00	+5.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	59.26	-0.04	+59.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	359.44	-0.10	+359.54

TRSY vs. SCHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSY Sharpe Ratio is 9.99, which is higher than the SCHQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSY and SCHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRSY vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSY drawdown since its inception was -0.82%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSY and SCHQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRSY	SCHQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.82%	-46.13%	+45.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.07%	-7.05%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.38%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-38.61%	+38.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-26.60%	+26.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	3.20%	-3.19%

Volatility

TRSY vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF (TRSY) is 0.13%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that TRSY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRSY	SCHQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.13%	2.24%	-2.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.25%	6.30%	-6.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40%	8.50%	-8.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.07%	14.41%	-13.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.07%	15.20%	-14.13%

TRSY vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRSY has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRSY vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison

TRSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than SCHQ's 4.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SCHQ Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF	4.50%	4.54%	4.58%	3.79%	2.88%	1.69%	1.51%	0.44%
TRSY Xtrackers US 0-1 Year Treasury ETF	3.29%	4.00%	0.96%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRSY and SCHQ in my portfolio?

TRSY and SCHQ have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRSY or SCHQ?

SCHQ has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to TRSY (0.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRSY dropped -0.82% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.

Which ETF is better, TRSY or SCHQ?

On 1-year performance, TRSY leads with 3.78% vs -1.68% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, TRSY has been the lower-risk option at 0.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TRSY or SCHQ?

Over the 1-year period, TRSY has performed better with a 3.78% return vs -1.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRSY or SCHQ?

SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for TRSY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRSY or SCHQ?

SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 3.29% for TRSY.

What is the main difference between TRSY and SCHQ?

TRSY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index, while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRSY and 0.03% for SCHQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.98 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.