TRSX.L vs. ACWD.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRSX.L (SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF) and ACWD.L (SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRSX.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while ACWD.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRSX.L returned -1.03%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for ACWD.L. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRSX.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for ACWD.L.

Performance

TRSX.L vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRSX.L achieves a -0.29% return, which is significantly lower than ACWD.L's 11.57% return.

TRSX.L

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -0.50%
• YTD: -0.29%
• 6M: -0.96%
• 1Y: 4.24%
• 3Y*: 2.45%
• 5Y*: -1.03%
• 10Y*: —

ACWD.L

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 4.34%
• YTD: 11.57%
• 6M: 13.24%
• 1Y: 29.71%
• 3Y*: 21.32%
• 5Y*: 11.33%
• 10Y*: 12.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRSX.L vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRSX.L SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF	-0.29%	8.02%	-0.62%	3.29%	-14.99%	-2.94%	9.77%	6.30%	-2.18%	-0.07%
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	11.57%	22.83%	17.76%	22.27%	-18.37%	18.77%	15.91%	25.80%	-9.85%	4.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSX.L and ACWD.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2017	0.03

Over the past year, TRSX.L and ACWD.L have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

TRSX.L vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRSX.L

TRSX.L Risk / Return Rank: 35
TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
TRSX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
TRSX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 35
TRSX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
TRSX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 32

ACWD.L

ACWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ACWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
ACWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ACWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
ACWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRSX.L vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRSX.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	2.36	-1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.96	3.49	-1.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.44	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	3.39	-1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.57	14.15	-9.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRSX.L vs. ACWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSX.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the ACWD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSX.L and ACWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRSX.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	2.36	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.23	0.73	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.73	-0.59

Drawdowns

TRSX.L vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSX.L drawdown since its inception was -23.50%, smaller than the maximum ACWD.L drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSX.L and ACWD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRSX.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.50%	-33.64%	+10.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.05%	-8.73%	+4.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.35%	-16.51%	+9.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.96%	-26.18%	+5.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.76%	-0.66%	-10.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.02%	-4.67%	-6.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	2.09%	+0.15%

Volatility

TRSX.L vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRSX.L) is 1.88%, while SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) has a volatility of 3.87%. This indicates that TRSX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRSX.L	ACWD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	3.87%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.46%	9.89%	-6.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.74%	12.56%	-6.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.52%	15.58%	-2.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.54%	15.85%	-2.31%

TRSX.L vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRSX.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWD.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRSX.L vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison

TRSX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, while ACWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRSX.L SPDR Bloomberg 7-10 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF	4.10%	3.93%	3.59%	2.71%	1.65%	1.02%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRSX.L and ACWD.L in my portfolio?

TRSX.L and ACWD.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRSX.L or ACWD.L?

On fees, TRSX.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRSX.L or ACWD.L?

TRSX.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ACWD.L.

What is the main difference between TRSX.L and ACWD.L?

TRSX.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while ACWD.L is Global Equities. TRSX.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while ACWD.L tracks MSCI ACWI Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TRSX.L and 0.12% for ACWD.L.