PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRSG.L vs. PR1T.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRSG.L vs. PR1T.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRSG.L is traded in GBp, while PR1T.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PR1T.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRSG.L achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly lower than PR1T.L's 1.84% return.


TRSG.L

1D
0.21%
1M
0.99%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
-0.58%
1Y
4.80%
3Y*
0.25%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*

PR1T.L

1D
0.03%
1M
1.53%
YTD
1.84%
6M
1.05%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
2.02%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRSG.L vs. PR1T.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TRSG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.08%-0.91%2.57%-1.87%-1.86%-1.12%-7.58%
PR1T.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)
1.84%-3.21%7.04%-0.41%12.57%1.04%-6.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TRSG.L and PR1T.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2020

0.65

The correlation between TRSG.L and PR1T.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRSG.L vs. PR1T.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRSG.L
TRSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TRSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

PR1T.L
PR1T.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PR1T.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRSG.L vs. PR1T.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L) and Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRSG.LPR1T.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.13

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

0.95

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.08

2.59

-0.51

TRSG.L vs. PR1T.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRSG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is comparable to the PR1T.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRSG.L and PR1T.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRSG.LPR1T.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

0.74

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

0.51

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.23

-0.15

Drawdowns

TRSG.L vs. PR1T.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRSG.L drawdown since its inception was -23.68%, which is greater than PR1T.L's maximum drawdown of -16.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRSG.L and PR1T.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRSG.LPR1T.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.68%

-16.09%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.24%

-5.15%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.17%

-9.86%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.12%

-16.09%

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.65%

-6.40%

-12.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.47%

-7.80%

-7.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.89%

+0.29%

Volatility

TRSG.L vs. PR1T.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRSG.L) is 1.47%, while Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C) (PR1T.L) has a volatility of 1.76%. This indicates that TRSG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PR1T.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRSG.LPR1T.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

1.76%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.45%

4.96%

-0.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.05%

6.58%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.71%

8.46%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.42%

8.34%

+1.08%

TRSG.L vs. PR1T.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRSG.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1T.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRSG.L vs. PR1T.L - Dividend Comparison

TRSG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, while PR1T.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PR1T.L
Amundi Prime US Treasury Bond 0-1 Y UCITS ETF DR USD (C)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRSG.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.24%4.22%4.16%3.85%1.94%1.12%1.69%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRSG.L and PR1T.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PR1T.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PR1T.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for TRSG.L.

TRSG.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while PR1T.L tracks Solactive US Treasury 0-1 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRSG.L and 0.05% for PR1T.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRSG.L and PR1T.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer