PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRS5.L vs. USTY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRS5.L vs. USTY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRS5.L is traded in USD, while USTY.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USTY.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRS5.L achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than USTY.L's 0.42% return. Over the past 10 years, TRS5.L has underperformed USTY.L with an annualized return of 0.83%, while USTY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.54% annualized return.


TRS5.L

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
0.07%
1Y
3.32%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
0.83%

USTY.L

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.28%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.88%
1Y
5.09%
3Y*
3.82%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
1.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRS5.L vs. USTY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRS5.L
SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-0.40%7.27%2.02%4.16%-9.49%-2.44%6.80%4.29%-0.46%-0.42%
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
0.42%7.65%1.64%3.84%-12.17%-1.76%7.78%8.38%1.15%2.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TRS5.L and USTY.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016

0.59

The correlation between TRS5.L and USTY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRS5.L vs. USTY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRS5.L
TRS5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TRS5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

USTY.L
USTY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
USTY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USTY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
USTY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
USTY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
USTY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRS5.L vs. USTY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) and SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRS5.LUSTY.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.16

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.46

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.14

4.56

-0.42

TRS5.L vs. USTY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRS5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the USTY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRS5.L and USTY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRS5.LUSTY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

0.94

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.04

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.22

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.26

-0.04

Drawdowns

TRS5.L vs. USTY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRS5.L drawdown since its inception was -14.35%, smaller than the maximum USTY.L drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRS5.L and USTY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRS5.LUSTY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.35%

-18.61%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

-3.42%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-5.11%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.64%

-16.44%

+2.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.35%

-18.61%

+4.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-3.73%

+2.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-5.80%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

1.09%

-0.31%

Volatility

TRS5.L vs. USTY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) is 1.15%, while SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USTY.L) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that TRS5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USTY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRS5.LUSTY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.73%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.14%

3.97%

-1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

5.33%

-2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.71%

7.13%

-2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.81%

6.86%

-3.05%

TRS5.L vs. USTY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TRS5.L and USTY.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRS5.L vs. USTY.L - Dividend Comparison

TRS5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than USTY.L's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TRS5.L
SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
3.93%3.68%3.24%1.97%1.12%0.98%1.66%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USTY.L
SPDR Bloomberg US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
4.87%4.61%3.81%2.81%1.57%1.31%2.49%2.79%2.11%2.11%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRS5.L and USTY.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRS5.L and USTY.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

TRS5.L tracks Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index, while USTY.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRS5.L and USTY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer