TRS5.L vs. CYGB.L
TRS5.L (SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF) and CYGB.L (iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - TRS5.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index, while CYGB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRS5.L returned 0.30%/yr vs 4.95%/yr for CYGB.L. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRS5.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CYGB.L.
Performance
TRS5.L vs. CYGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TRS5.L is traded in USD, while CYGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the CYGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRS5.L achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than CYGB.L's 3.39% return.
TRS5.L
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- 3.76%
- 5Y*
- 0.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.24%
CYGB.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- 6M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- 4.95%
- 10Y*
- —
TRS5.L vs. CYGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRS5.L SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF | -0.24% | 7.28% | 2.01% | 4.18% | -9.49% | -1.60% |
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 3.39% | 9.91% | 9.53% | 12.79% | -8.81% | -1.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRS5.L and CYGB.L is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRS5.L vs. CYGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
TRS5.L
CYGB.L
TRS5.L vs. CYGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) and iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRS5.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.09 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.21 | 0.97 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.17 | 2.20 | +0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRS5.L vs. CYGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRS5.L drawdown since its inception was -14.35%, smaller than the maximum CYGB.L drawdown of -22.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRS5.L and CYGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRS5.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.35% | -22.10% | +7.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.50% | -4.04% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.72% | -6.48% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.64% | -21.63% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.44% | -0.67% | -0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -4.36% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 1.78% | -0.82% |
Volatility
TRS5.L vs. CYGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) is 0.83%, while iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (CYGB.L) has a volatility of 1.86%. This indicates that TRS5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CYGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRS5.L | CYGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 1.86% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 5.73% | -3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89% | 7.40% | -4.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.72% | 8.87% | -4.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 8.74% | -4.97% |
TRS5.L vs. CYGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRS5.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CYGB.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRS5.L vs. CYGB.L - Dividend Comparison
TRS5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than CYGB.L's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CYGB.L iShares China CNY Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 1.70% | 1.84% | 2.13% | 2.38% | 2.68% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRS5.L SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF | 3.92% | 3.68% | 3.24% | 1.97% | 1.12% | 0.98% | 1.66% | 2.13% | 1.66% | 1.40% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRS5.L and CYGB.L have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRS5.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRS5.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for CYGB.L.
TRS5.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while CYGB.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. TRS5.L tracks Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index, while CYGB.L tracks Bloomberg China Treasury + Policy Bank Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TRS5.L and 0.40% for CYGB.L.
Find the right allocation for TRS5.L and CYGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer