PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRS5.L vs. CBU7.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRS5.L vs. CBU7.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBU7.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRS5.L achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly higher than CBU7.L's -0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, TRS5.L has underperformed CBU7.L with an annualized return of 0.83%, while CBU7.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.39% annualized return.


TRS5.L

1D
0.18%
1M
-0.41%
YTD
-0.40%
6M
0.07%
1Y
3.32%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
0.83%

CBU7.L

1D
0.19%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
-0.52%
6M
0.02%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
1.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRS5.L vs. CBU7.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRS5.L
SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
-0.40%7.27%2.02%4.16%-9.49%-2.44%6.80%4.29%-0.46%-0.42%
CBU7.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc
-0.52%7.34%2.16%4.26%-9.35%-2.35%6.98%6.06%1.21%1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between TRS5.L and CBU7.L is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016

0.88

The correlation between TRS5.L and CBU7.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRS5.L vs. CBU7.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRS5.L
TRS5.L Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TRS5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRS5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

CBU7.L
CBU7.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
CBU7.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBU7.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBU7.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
CBU7.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBU7.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRS5.L vs. CBU7.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBU7.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRS5.LCBU7.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.19

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

1.26

+0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.14

4.06

+0.08

TRS5.L vs. CBU7.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRS5.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the CBU7.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRS5.L and CBU7.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRS5.LCBU7.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11

1.07

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

0.08

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.34

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.58

-0.35

Drawdowns

TRS5.L vs. CBU7.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRS5.L drawdown since its inception was -14.35%, roughly equal to the maximum CBU7.L drawdown of -14.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRS5.L and CBU7.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRS5.LCBU7.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.35%

-14.18%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.48%

-2.50%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.70%

-3.66%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.64%

-13.55%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.35%

-14.18%

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-1.60%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-3.33%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.77%

+0.01%

Volatility

TRS5.L vs. CBU7.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (TRS5.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBU7.L) have volatilities of 1.15% and 1.13%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRS5.LCBU7.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.15%

1.13%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.14%

2.15%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

2.96%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.71%

4.70%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.81%

4.10%

-0.29%

TRS5.L vs. CBU7.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRS5.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CBU7.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRS5.L vs. CBU7.L - Dividend Comparison

TRS5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, while CBU7.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CBU7.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRS5.L
SPDR Bloomberg 3-7 Year US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF
3.93%3.68%3.24%1.97%1.12%0.98%1.66%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TRS5.L and CBU7.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TRS5.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRS5.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for CBU7.L.

TRS5.L tracks Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index, while CBU7.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 3-7 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for TRS5.L and 0.07% for CBU7.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRS5.L and CBU7.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer