PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRMX vs. PRWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRMX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRMX achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's 5.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRRMX having a 11.09% annualized return and PRWCX not far ahead at 11.22%.


TRRMX

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.00%
YTD
10.91%
6M
7.10%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
11.09%

PRWCX

1D
-0.26%
1M
1.53%
YTD
5.48%
6M
5.62%
1Y
14.32%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
11.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRMX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRMX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund
10.91%14.26%14.19%20.85%-19.09%17.51%18.67%25.35%-7.66%20.83%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
5.48%12.45%12.50%18.85%-12.00%18.45%18.13%24.62%0.63%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRMX and PRWCX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.93

The correlation between TRRMX and PRWCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRMX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRMX
TRRMX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TRRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWCX
PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRMX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRRMXPRWCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.37

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.33

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

10.19

-1.25

TRRMX vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRMX and PRWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRRMXPRWCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

1.97

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.69

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.88

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.91

-0.45

Drawdowns

TRRMX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRMX drawdown since its inception was -53.59%, which is greater than PRWCX's maximum drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRMX and PRWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRMXPRWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.59%

-41.77%

-11.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-6.32%

-3.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-15.96%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

-17.07%

-10.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

-26.86%

-5.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.68%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-3.33%

-4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.44%

+0.87%

Volatility

TRRMX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 1.95%. This indicates that TRRMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRMXPRWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

1.95%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

6.00%

+4.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

7.46%

+4.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

12.74%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

12.74%

+2.75%

TRRMX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRMX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

TRRMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRWCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
8.36%8.81%10.38%4.15%9.44%9.23%7.97%5.83%7.46%6.82%3.51%9.86%
TRRMX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund
0.00%0.00%1.88%4.45%7.81%6.91%4.33%5.75%8.56%2.32%3.08%3.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRRMX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRRMX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to PRWCX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRMX dropped -53.59% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.

PRWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRMX and PRWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer