PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRKX vs. FFFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRKX vs. FFFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund (TRRKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRKX achieves a 10.90% return, which is significantly lower than FFFGX's 14.50% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRKX has underperformed FFFGX with an annualized return of 11.12%, while FFFGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.60% annualized return.


TRRKX

1D
1.15%
1M
1.33%
YTD
10.90%
6M
10.68%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
15.76%
5Y*
8.05%
10Y*
11.12%

FFFGX

1D
1.44%
1M
3.23%
YTD
14.50%
6M
14.51%
1Y
31.90%
3Y*
19.88%
5Y*
10.85%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRKX vs. FFFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRKX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund
10.90%14.20%13.94%20.52%-19.03%15.80%18.64%25.41%-7.66%22.42%
FFFGX
Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund
14.50%23.77%13.95%20.56%-18.29%16.55%18.22%25.41%-8.89%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRKX and FFFGX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2006

0.97

The correlation between TRRKX and FFFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRKX vs. FFFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRKX
TRRKX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TRRKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFGX
FFFGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FFFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRKX vs. FFFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund (TRRKX) and Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRRKXFFFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

3.30

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.06

14.36

-5.30

TRRKX vs. FFFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRKX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the FFFGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRKX and FFFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRRKX vs. FFFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRKX drawdown since its inception was -53.54%, roughly equal to the maximum FFFGX drawdown of -54.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRKX and FFFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRKXFFFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.54%

-54.61%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-9.57%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-15.42%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.75%

-27.33%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.48%

-30.95%

-1.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

0.00%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-8.34%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.20%

+0.09%

Volatility

TRRKX vs. FFFGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund (TRRKX) is 4.76%, while Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that TRRKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRKXFFFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

5.61%

-0.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

11.36%

-0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

13.41%

-0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

15.13%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.37%

15.42%

-0.05%

TRRKX vs. FFFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRKX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFGX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRKX vs. FFFGX - Dividend Comparison

TRRKX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FFFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFGX
Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund
5.74%4.40%1.97%1.84%12.04%12.00%4.99%6.51%7.82%4.01%4.15%4.07%
TRRKX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2045 Fund
0.00%0.00%1.96%4.40%7.83%5.58%4.52%5.94%8.98%3.52%3.20%4.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TRRKX and FFFGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFFGX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to TRRKX (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRKX dropped -53.54% vs FFFGX's -54.61%.

FFFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRKX and FFFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer