TRRJX vs. FHATX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRRJX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund) and FHATX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, TRRJX returned 6.67%/yr vs 6.94%/yr for FHATX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRRJX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FHATX.

Performance

TRRJX vs. FHATX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FHATX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TRRJX having a 9.32% return and FHATX slightly lower at 9.06%.

TRRJX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 3.73%
• YTD: 9.32%
• 6M: 4.93%
• 1Y: 15.92%
• 3Y*: 14.07%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 9.82%

FHATX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 3.59%
• YTD: 9.06%
• 6M: 9.81%
• 1Y: 21.15%
• 3Y*: 14.99%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRJX vs. FHATX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
TRRJX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund	9.32%	10.96%	11.99%	18.14%	-17.96%	15.21%	17.04%	23.72%	-10.44%
FHATX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund	9.06%	16.87%	11.20%	15.29%	-17.26%	11.13%	15.04%	22.58%	-12.00%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRJX and FHATX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.94

The correlation between TRRJX and FHATX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TRRJX vs. FHATX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRJX

TRRJX Risk / Return Rank: 32
TRRJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
TRRJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
TRRJX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
TRRJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
TRRJX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

FHATX

FHATX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FHATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FHATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FHATX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FHATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FHATX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRJX vs. FHATX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FHATX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRRJX	FHATX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.46	-0.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	3.50	-1.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.48	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	3.18	-1.11
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.96	13.74	-5.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRRJX vs. FHATX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRJX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the FHATX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRJX and FHATX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRRJX	FHATX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.59	2.46	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.64	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.69	-0.18

Drawdowns

TRRJX vs. FHATX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRJX drawdown since its inception was -53.57%, which is greater than FHATX's maximum drawdown of -24.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRJX and FHATX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRRJX	FHATX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.57%	-24.70%	-28.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.06%	-6.76%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.52%	-10.11%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.85%	-24.67%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.65%	-5.35%	-1.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.06%	1.56%	+0.50%

Volatility

TRRJX vs. FHATX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund (TRRJX) is 2.95%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FHATX) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that TRRJX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHATX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRRJX	FHATX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.95%	3.19%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.89%	7.27%	+1.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.45%	8.73%	+1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.83%	10.87%	+1.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.54%	12.34%	+1.20%

TRRJX vs. FHATX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRJX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FHATX's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRRJX vs. FHATX - Dividend Comparison

TRRJX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FHATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHATX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund	3.57%	3.00%	4.18%	2.22%	5.68%	7.21%	4.46%	3.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRRJX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2035 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	2.36%	4.68%	9.67%	6.89%	4.80%	5.68%	8.55%	3.80%	2.89%	4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRRJX and FHATX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, TRRJX and FHATX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TRRJX or FHATX?

FHATX has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to TRRJX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRJX dropped -53.57% vs FHATX's -24.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHATX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.