FHATX vs. PBPNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHATX (Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund) and PBPNX (PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHATX returned 6.94%/yr vs 5.99%/yr for PBPNX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHATX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for PBPNX.

Performance

FHATX vs. PBPNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FHATX) and PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHATX achieves a 9.06% return, which is significantly higher than PBPNX's 7.63% return.

FHATX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 3.59%
• YTD: 9.06%
• 6M: 9.81%
• 1Y: 21.15%
• 3Y*: 14.99%
• 5Y*: 6.94%
• 10Y*: —

PBPNX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 3.20%
• YTD: 7.63%
• 6M: 7.89%
• 1Y: 19.14%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 5.99%
• 10Y*: 8.59%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHATX vs. PBPNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHATX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund	9.06%	16.87%	11.20%	15.29%	-17.26%	11.13%	15.04%	22.58%	-12.00%
PBPNX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund	7.63%	15.13%	7.96%	14.66%	-17.47%	12.97%	14.28%	21.31%	-8.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FHATX and PBPNX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	0.96

The correlation between FHATX and PBPNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHATX vs. PBPNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHATX

FHATX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FHATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FHATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FHATX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FHATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FHATX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

PBPNX

PBPNX Risk / Return Rank: 72
PBPNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PBPNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
PBPNX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
PBPNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PBPNX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHATX vs. PBPNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FHATX) and PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHATX	PBPNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.46	2.56	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	3.62	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.50	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.18	3.06	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.74	13.65	+0.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHATX vs. PBPNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHATX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the PBPNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHATX and PBPNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHATX	PBPNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.46	2.56	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.59	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.73	-0.04

Drawdowns

FHATX vs. PBPNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHATX drawdown since its inception was -24.70%, roughly equal to the maximum PBPNX drawdown of -24.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHATX and PBPNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHATX	PBPNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.70%	-24.09%	-0.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.76%	-6.35%	-0.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.11%	-9.39%	-0.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.67%	-23.90%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.35%	-4.36%	-0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.56%	1.42%	+0.14%

Volatility

FHATX vs. PBPNX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund (FHATX) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund (PBPNX) at 2.57%. This indicates that FHATX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBPNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHATX	PBPNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.19%	2.57%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.27%	6.13%	+1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.73%	7.56%	+1.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.87%	10.16%	+0.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.34%	10.61%	+1.73%

FHATX vs. PBPNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHATX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than PBPNX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHATX vs. PBPNX - Dividend Comparison

FHATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than PBPNX's 3.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHATX Fidelity Freedom Blend 2030 Fund	3.57%	3.00%	4.18%	2.22%	5.68%	7.21%	4.46%	3.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBPNX PIMCO RealPath Blend 2030 Fund	3.68%	4.05%	4.02%	3.30%	3.84%	5.10%	3.21%	3.81%	4.68%	2.14%	3.11%	2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHATX and PBPNX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FHATX and PBPNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHATX or PBPNX?

FHATX has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to PBPNX (2.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHATX dropped -24.70% vs PBPNX's -24.09%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PBPNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.