PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRCX vs. PTDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRCX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRCX achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly higher than PTDIX's 6.96% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRCX has underperformed PTDIX with an annualized return of 9.09%, while PTDIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.85% annualized return.


TRRCX

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.98%
YTD
7.50%
6M
7.11%
1Y
11.06%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
9.09%

PTDIX

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.19%
YTD
6.96%
6M
6.54%
1Y
17.41%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
8.04%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRCX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRCX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund
7.50%8.23%10.73%16.36%-16.89%13.70%15.90%22.50%-6.36%19.46%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
6.96%15.59%17.43%18.33%-18.13%15.35%16.04%24.91%-7.95%20.69%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRCX and PTDIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.96

The correlation between TRRCX and PTDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRCX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRCX
TRRCX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TRRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

PTDIX
PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRCX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRRCXPTDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

2.51

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.97

10.92

-5.95

TRRCX vs. PTDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the PTDIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRCX and PTDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRRCX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRCX drawdown since its inception was -52.28%, roughly equal to the maximum PTDIX drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRCX and PTDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRCXPTDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.28%

-54.38%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.93%

-7.32%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.46%

-13.05%

+2.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-25.43%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.55%

-30.02%

+1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-0.78%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.06%

-7.48%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

1.68%

+0.70%

Volatility

TRRCX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) is 3.32%, while Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) has a volatility of 3.96%. This indicates that TRRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTDIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRCXPTDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.96%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

8.55%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.99%

10.39%

-0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.41%

13.58%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.26%

13.86%

-1.60%

TRRCX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRCX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than PTDIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRCX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison

TRRCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
9.16%9.80%12.28%4.40%8.61%8.92%6.01%7.26%9.28%6.07%4.86%6.73%
TRRCX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund
0.00%0.00%3.38%6.16%12.05%9.43%5.45%5.44%8.83%3.82%2.66%3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TRRCX and PTDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PTDIX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to TRRCX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRCX dropped -52.28% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.

PTDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRCX and PTDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer