TRRCX vs. FBND

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TRRCX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both funds - TRRCX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, TRRCX returned 8.81%/yr vs 2.54%/yr for FBND. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRRCX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.

Performance

TRRCX vs. FBND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRCX achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly higher than FBND's 0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRCX has outperformed FBND with an annualized return of 8.81%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively lower 2.54% annualized return.

TRRCX

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 9.28%
• 3Y*: 11.17%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 8.81%

FBND

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 0.70%
• 6M: 1.04%
• 1Y: 4.85%
• 3Y*: 4.89%
• 5Y*: 0.76%
• 10Y*: 2.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRCX vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRRCX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund	6.49%	8.23%	10.73%	16.36%	-16.89%	13.70%	15.90%	22.50%	-6.36%	19.46%
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	0.70%	7.57%	2.13%	6.81%	-12.54%	-0.43%	9.41%	9.82%	-0.57%	3.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRCX and FBND is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014	0.20

Over the past year, TRRCX and FBND have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

TRRCX vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRCX

TRRCX Risk / Return Rank: 20
TRRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TRRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TRRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TRRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
TRRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FBND

FBND Risk / Return Rank: 40
FBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
FBND Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
FBND Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRCX vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRRCX	FBND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.27	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	1.90	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.22	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	1.83	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.13	5.32	-1.20

TRRCX vs. FBND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the FBND Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRCX and FBND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRRCX vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRCX drawdown since its inception was -52.28%, which is greater than FBND's maximum drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRCX and FBND.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRRCX	FBND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.28%	-17.25%	-35.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.93%	-2.66%	-5.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.46%	-5.94%	-4.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.07%	-17.25%	-6.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.55%	-17.25%	-11.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-1.23%	-0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.07%	-3.34%	-2.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	0.91%	+1.46%

Volatility

TRRCX vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) at 1.35%. This indicates that TRRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRRCX	FBND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	1.35%	+2.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.65%	2.81%	+5.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.93%	3.83%	+6.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.40%	5.92%	+5.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.26%	6.10%	+6.16%

TRRCX vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRCX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRRCX vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison

TRRCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF	4.69%	4.70%	4.73%	4.26%	3.07%	1.86%	4.25%	2.90%	2.93%	2.56%	2.84%	3.26%
TRRCX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.38%	6.16%	12.05%	9.43%	5.45%	5.44%	8.83%	3.82%	2.66%	3.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRRCX and FBND in my portfolio?

TRRCX and FBND have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRRCX or FBND?

TRRCX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to FBND (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRCX dropped -52.28% vs FBND's -17.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.