TRPWX vs. POAGX
TRPWX (TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund) and POAGX (PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TRPWX returned 7.53%/yr vs 15.04%/yr for POAGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRPWX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for POAGX.
Performance
TRPWX vs. POAGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRPWX achieves a -1.03% return, which is significantly lower than POAGX's 20.52% return. Over the past 10 years, TRPWX has underperformed POAGX with an annualized return of 7.53%, while POAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.04% annualized return.
TRPWX
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- 6M
- -3.64%
- YTD
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- -2.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.10%
- 5Y*
- -2.37%
- 10Y*
- 7.53%
POAGX
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- YTD
- 20.52%
- 1Y
- 43.49%
- 3Y*
- 22.33%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
TRPWX vs. POAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRPWX TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -1.03% | 4.26% | 8.50% | 21.45% | -33.08% | 2.88% | 45.32% | 33.47% | -8.63% | 25.57% |
POAGX PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund | 20.52% | 28.68% | 12.56% | 25.02% | -24.25% | 4.02% | 29.17% | 23.52% | -7.10% | 33.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRPWX and POAGX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2004 | 0.90 |
The correlation between TRPWX and POAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRPWX vs. POAGX — Risk / Return Rank
TRPWX
POAGX
TRPWX vs. POAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund (TRPWX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRPWX | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.33 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 2.65 | -2.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.33 | 10.28 | -10.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRPWX vs. POAGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRPWX drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than POAGX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRPWX and POAGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRPWX | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -55.77% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.51% | -16.87% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.39% | -24.73% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.12% | -38.80% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.12% | -38.80% | -5.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.87% | -8.10% | -9.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.43% | -9.50% | -1.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.92% | 4.34% | +1.58% |
Volatility
TRPWX vs. POAGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund (TRPWX) is 5.40%, while PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX) has a volatility of 8.95%. This indicates that TRPWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRPWX | POAGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.40% | 8.95% | -3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.54% | 19.70% | -5.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.30% | 23.36% | -5.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 23.46% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 23.06% | +0.24% |
TRPWX vs. POAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRPWX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than POAGX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRPWX vs. POAGX - Dividend Comparison
TRPWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.09%, which matches POAGX's 11.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POAGX PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund | 11.00% | 13.25% | 9.90% | 5.54% | 10.78% | 5.93% | 7.84% | 5.33% | 7.82% | 0.86% | 16.63% | 12.52% |
TRPWX TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 11.09% | 10.97% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.60% | 15.18% | 11.52% | 11.22% | 17.00% | 9.47% | 0.51% | 8.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRPWX and POAGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POAGX has higher volatility (8.95%) compared to TRPWX (5.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRPWX dropped -58.68% vs POAGX's -55.77%.
POAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRPWX and POAGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer