TRPWX vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund (TRPWX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
TRPWX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.
Performance
TRPWX vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRPWX vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRPWX TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund | -6.10% | 4.26% | 8.50% | 21.45% | -33.08% | 2.88% | 45.32% | 33.47% | -8.63% | 25.57% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.56% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRPWX achieves a -6.10% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, TRPWX has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 7.61%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 9.83% annualized return.
TRPWX
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- -5.59%
- YTD
- -6.10%
- 6M
- -10.48%
- 1Y
- 8.69%
- 3Y*
- 5.54%
- 5Y*
- -2.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
IWM
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 3.44%
- 1Y
- 26.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRPWX vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRPWX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRPWX vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
TRPWX
IWM
TRPWX vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund (TRPWX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRPWX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.42 | 1.15 | -0.73 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.77 | 1.70 | -0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.22 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.93 | -1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.32 | 7.08 | -5.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRPWX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 | 1.15 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | 0.15 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.43 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.34 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRPWX and IWM is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRPWX vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
TRPWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.68%, more than IWM's 1.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRPWX TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund | 11.68% | 10.97% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.60% | 15.18% | 11.52% | 11.22% | 17.00% | 9.47% | 0.51% | 8.63% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.02% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Drawdowns
TRPWX vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRPWX drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, roughly equal to the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRPWX and IWM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRPWX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -59.05% | +0.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.51% | -13.74% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.12% | -31.91% | -12.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.12% | -41.13% | -2.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.08% | -7.33% | -14.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.37% | -10.83% | -0.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.24% | 3.73% | +1.51% |
Volatility
TRPWX vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund (TRPWX) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) have volatilities of 7.11% and 7.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRPWX | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 7.36% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 14.48% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.57% | 23.18% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 22.54% | +0.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 22.99% | +0.25% |