PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRPWX vs. FAMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRPWX vs. FAMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund (TRPWX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TRPWX having a 4.28% return and FAMVX slightly higher at 4.31%. Over the past 10 years, TRPWX has underperformed FAMVX with an annualized return of 8.45%, while FAMVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.21% annualized return.


TRPWX

1D
-0.33%
1M
2.71%
YTD
4.28%
6M
2.72%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
8.97%
5Y*
-0.60%
10Y*
8.45%

FAMVX

1D
0.87%
1M
1.01%
YTD
4.31%
6M
3.05%
1Y
5.08%
3Y*
13.24%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRPWX vs. FAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRPWX
TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund
4.28%4.26%8.50%21.45%-33.08%2.88%45.32%33.47%-8.63%25.57%
FAMVX
FAM Value Fund
4.31%4.90%15.51%16.09%-14.06%25.65%6.81%30.31%-6.15%17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TRPWX and FAMVX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002

0.84

The correlation between TRPWX and FAMVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRPWX vs. FAMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRPWX
TRPWX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TRPWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRPWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRPWX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TRPWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRPWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FAMVX
FAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRPWX vs. FAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund (TRPWX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRPWXFAMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.08

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.39

0.62

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

1.87

-0.79

TRPWX vs. FAMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRPWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is comparable to the FAMVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRPWX and FAMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRPWXFAMVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

0.43

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.39

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.56

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.58

-0.14

Drawdowns

TRPWX vs. FAMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRPWX drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than FAMVX's maximum drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRPWX and FAMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRPWXFAMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.68%

-51.12%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.51%

-9.47%

-6.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.39%

-16.74%

-9.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.12%

-22.77%

-21.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.12%

-37.73%

-6.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.46%

-2.87%

-10.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.41%

-6.43%

-4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.64%

3.14%

+2.50%

Volatility

TRPWX vs. FAMVX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund (TRPWX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) have volatilities of 4.00% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRPWXFAMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.81%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.36%

10.33%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.42%

13.62%

+3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.44%

17.15%

+6.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.28%

18.21%

+5.07%

TRPWX vs. FAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRPWX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMVX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRPWX vs. FAMVX - Dividend Comparison

TRPWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than FAMVX's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAMVX
FAM Value Fund
4.70%4.90%6.28%5.01%3.67%4.99%3.69%6.80%4.09%5.06%5.21%9.06%
TRPWX
TIAA-CREF Mid-Cap Growth Fund
10.52%10.97%0.00%0.18%0.60%15.18%11.52%11.22%17.00%9.47%0.51%8.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRPWX and FAMVX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRPWX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to FAMVX (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRPWX dropped -58.68% vs FAMVX's -51.12%.

FAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRPWX and FAMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer