TRPA vs. IBID
TRPA (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and IBID (iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRPA is a CLO fund actively managed by Hartford, while IBID is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. TRPA is actively managed, while IBID is passively managed. Over the past year, TRPA returned 5.51% vs 3.92% for IBID. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. TRPA charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBID.
Performance
TRPA vs. IBID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRPA achieves a 2.30% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 1.94% return.
TRPA
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- 5.51%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBID
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRPA vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 2.30% | 4.82% |
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 1.94% | 2.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRPA and IBID is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRPA vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank
TRPA
IBID
TRPA vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRPA | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.72 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.06 | 7.20 | +1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.94 | 29.14 | +7.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRPA vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRPA drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum IBID drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRPA and IBID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRPA | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -1.28% | +0.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.61% | -0.55% | -0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.55% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.09% | -0.22% | +0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.15% | 0.13% | +0.02% |
Volatility
TRPA vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) is 0.23%, while iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) has a volatility of 0.35%. This indicates that TRPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRPA | IBID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.23% | 0.35% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.50% | 0.86% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31% | 1.23% | +1.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.33% | 2.24% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.33% | 2.24% | +0.09% |
TRPA vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRPA has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TRPA vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison
TRPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.17%, more than IBID's 3.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IBID iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF | 3.68% | 4.43% | 4.24% | 0.81% |
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF | 5.17% | 4.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRPA and IBID have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBID has higher volatility (0.35%) compared to TRPA (0.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRPA dropped -0.61% vs IBID's -1.28%.
On 1-year performance, TRPA leads with 5.51% vs 3.92% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, TRPA has been the lower-risk option at 0.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TRPA has performed better with a 5.51% return vs 3.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for TRPA.
TRPA has the higher dividend yield at 5.17%, compared with 3.68% for IBID.
TRPA is categorized as CLO, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for TRPA and 0.10% for IBID.
IBID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRPA and IBID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer