TRPA vs. EMCB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TRPA (Hartford AAA CLO ETF) and EMCB (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - TRPA is a CLO fund actively managed by Hartford, while EMCB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by WisdomTree. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TRPA returned 5.28% vs 7.64% for EMCB. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRPA charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EMCB.

Performance

TRPA vs. EMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TRPA having a 1.92% return and EMCB slightly higher at 1.94%.

TRPA

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 1.92%
• 6M: 2.41%
• 1Y: 5.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMCB

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: 7.64%
• 3Y*: 7.93%
• 5Y*: 2.14%
• 10Y*: 4.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRPA vs. EMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	1.92%	4.84%
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	1.94%	7.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TRPA and EMCB is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025	0.07

Return for Risk

TRPA vs. EMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRPA

TRPA Risk / Return Rank: 83
TRPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TRPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
TRPA Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TRPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
TRPA Martin Ratio Rank: 96

EMCB

EMCB Risk / Return Rank: 53
EMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
EMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
EMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
EMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
EMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRPA vs. EMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRPA	EMCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	1.84	+0.43
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	2.65	+1.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.38	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.84	2.33	+6.51
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	35.98	8.29	+27.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRPA vs. EMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRPA Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the EMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRPA and EMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRPA	EMCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.27	1.84	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.56	0.46	+2.10

Drawdowns

TRPA vs. EMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRPA drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum EMCB drawdown of -22.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRPA and EMCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRPA	EMCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.61%	-22.81%	+22.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.61%	-3.07%	+2.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.20%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.04%	-0.73%	+0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.10%	-4.24%	+4.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.15%	0.86%	-0.71%

Volatility

TRPA vs. EMCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) is 0.28%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund (EMCB) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that TRPA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRPA	EMCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.28%	1.57%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.57%	2.90%	-1.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.34%	4.19%	-1.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.38%	6.94%	-4.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.38%	8.48%	-6.10%

TRPA vs. EMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRPA has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCB's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRPA vs. EMCB - Dividend Comparison

TRPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, less than EMCB's 5.36% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMCB WisdomTree Emerging Markets Corporate Bond Fund	5.36%	5.47%	5.29%	5.09%	4.04%	3.43%	3.85%	4.17%	4.20%	4.04%	4.08%	5.09%
TRPA Hartford AAA CLO ETF	5.19%	4.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRPA and EMCB in my portfolio?

TRPA and EMCB have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRPA or EMCB?

EMCB has higher volatility (1.57%) compared to TRPA (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRPA dropped -0.61% vs EMCB's -22.81%.

Which ETF is better, TRPA or EMCB?

On 1-year performance, EMCB leads with 7.64% vs 5.28% for TRPA. On fees, TRPA is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, TRPA has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TRPA or EMCB?

Over the 1-year period, EMCB has performed better with a 7.64% return vs 5.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRPA or EMCB?

TRPA is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMCB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRPA or EMCB?

EMCB has the higher dividend yield at 5.36%, compared with 5.19% for TRPA.

What is the main difference between TRPA and EMCB?

TRPA is categorized as CLO, while EMCB is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for TRPA and 0.60% for EMCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.