PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRMVX vs. HFCVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRMVX vs. HFCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Value Fund (TRMVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMVX achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly lower than HFCVX's 13.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRMVX having a 10.73% annualized return and HFCVX not far ahead at 11.12%.


TRMVX

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.27%
YTD
10.04%
6M
11.89%
1Y
26.89%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
9.56%
10Y*
10.73%

HFCVX

1D
-0.32%
1M
1.49%
YTD
13.34%
6M
14.54%
1Y
26.48%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRMVX vs. HFCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRMVX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Value Fund
10.04%18.89%12.67%8.82%-5.15%27.72%-2.40%22.70%-9.74%17.38%
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
13.34%18.27%9.59%5.81%6.12%29.94%-6.39%20.84%-9.50%19.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TRMVX and HFCVX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 1996

0.92

The correlation between TRMVX and HFCVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRMVX vs. HFCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMVX
TRMVX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
TRMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCVX
HFCVX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HFCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRMVX vs. HFCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Value Fund (TRMVX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRMVXHFCVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.49

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.31

6.90

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.70

21.08

-5.38

TRMVX vs. HFCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the HFCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMVX and HFCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRMVXHFCVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.84

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.88

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.68

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.41

+0.07

Drawdowns

TRMVX vs. HFCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMVX drawdown since its inception was -60.36%, smaller than the maximum HFCVX drawdown of -65.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMVX and HFCVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRMVXHFCVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.36%

-65.75%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.12%

-3.77%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.52%

-11.32%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.45%

-16.81%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.41%

-39.39%

-1.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-1.60%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.57%

-8.24%

-0.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.23%

+0.44%

Volatility

TRMVX vs. HFCVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Value Fund (TRMVX) is 2.51%, while Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund (HFCVX) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that TRMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFCVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRMVXHFCVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

2.74%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.63%

6.83%

+0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

9.16%

+1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

13.26%

+1.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

16.45%

+1.50%

TRMVX vs. HFCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRMVX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRMVX vs. HFCVX - Dividend Comparison

TRMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.32%, more than HFCVX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCVX
Hennessy Cornerstone Value Fund
6.52%7.39%4.56%3.57%10.33%4.81%2.58%6.58%17.16%14.97%2.26%2.57%
TRMVX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Value Fund
13.32%14.68%8.65%6.93%9.82%5.93%2.03%3.61%12.12%4.84%1.44%16.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRMVX and HFCVX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFCVX has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to TRMVX (2.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMVX dropped -60.36% vs HFCVX's -65.75%.

HFCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRMVX and HFCVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer