PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRMSX vs. WWNPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TRMSX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TRMSX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TRMSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund
-5.66%12.61%19.98%29.90%-28.56%7.68%
WWNPX
Kinetics Paradigm Fund
38.76%-14.61%88.34%-16.97%29.18%-11.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMSX achieves a -5.66% return, which is significantly lower than WWNPX's 38.76% return.


TRMSX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-7.91%
YTD
-5.66%
6M
-6.18%
1Y
15.19%
3Y*
15.33%
5Y*
10Y*

WWNPX

1D
1.54%
1M
-9.22%
YTD
38.76%
6M
23.34%
1Y
3.39%
3Y*
30.92%
5Y*
16.21%
10Y*
20.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TRMSX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRMSX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TRMSX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMSX
TRMSX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TRMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

WWNPX
WWNPX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
WWNPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WWNPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
WWNPX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
WWNPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
WWNPX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRMSX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRMSXWWNPXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

0.15

+0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.03

0.46

+0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.06

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

0.20

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.14

0.32

-0.46

TRMSX vs. WWNPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is higher than the WWNPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMSX and WWNPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRMSXWWNPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

0.15

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.55

-0.32

Correlation

The correlation between TRMSX and WWNPX is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

TRMSX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison

TRMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.87%, more than WWNPX's 5.92% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TRMSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund
6.87%6.49%1.98%0.86%1.92%4.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WWNPX
Kinetics Paradigm Fund
5.92%8.21%2.95%5.65%2.00%1.67%2.15%1.00%10.44%

Drawdowns

TRMSX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMSX drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, smaller than the maximum WWNPX drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMSX and WWNPX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TRMSXWWNPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.34%

-67.87%

+30.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.85%

-32.61%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.51%

-15.90%

+6.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.34%

-13.85%

-0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.30%

20.16%

-12.86%

Volatility

TRMSX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Index Fund (TRMSX) is 5.65%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 9.22%. This indicates that TRMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TRMSXWWNPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.65%

9.22%

-3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.96%

24.58%

-11.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.14%

36.48%

-11.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.12%

32.56%

-9.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.12%

28.17%

-5.05%