TRMIX vs. FASPX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRMIX (T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund Class I) and FASPX (Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TRMIX returned 11.21%/yr vs 10.60%/yr for FASPX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRMIX charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for FASPX.

Performance

TRMIX vs. FASPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund Class I (TRMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMIX achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly lower than FASPX's 20.76% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMIX has outperformed FASPX with an annualized return of 11.21%, while FASPX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.60% annualized return.

TRMIX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 3.70%
• YTD: 15.50%
• 6M: 15.46%
• 1Y: 26.89%
• 3Y*: 17.86%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: 11.21%

FASPX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 3.43%
• YTD: 20.76%
• 6M: 22.32%
• 1Y: 39.62%
• 3Y*: 13.92%
• 5Y*: 7.82%
• 10Y*: 10.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRMIX vs. FASPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRMIX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund Class I	15.50%	6.31%	16.40%	19.14%	-4.00%	24.66%	6.99%	19.72%	-10.54%	11.73%
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M	20.76%	7.76%	-2.60%	19.93%	-7.82%	32.65%	7.70%	33.85%	-17.27%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TRMIX and FASPX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2015	0.94

The correlation between TRMIX and FASPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TRMIX vs. FASPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRMIX

TRMIX Risk / Return Rank: 51
TRMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
TRMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TRMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
TRMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
TRMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

FASPX

FASPX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FASPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FASPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FASPX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
FASPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FASPX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRMIX vs. FASPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund Class I (TRMIX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRMIX	FASPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	2.49	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	3.52	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.42	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	4.30	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.38	15.87	-4.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRMIX vs. FASPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the FASPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMIX and FASPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRMIX	FASPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.00	2.49	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.38	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.48	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.41	+0.18

Drawdowns

TRMIX vs. FASPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMIX drawdown since its inception was -39.39%, smaller than the maximum FASPX drawdown of -70.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMIX and FASPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRMIX	FASPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.39%	-70.11%	+30.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.39%	-9.84%	+0.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.67%	-34.53%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.67%	-34.53%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.39%	-48.02%	+8.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.08%	0.00%	-0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.83%	-9.83%	+4.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.47%	2.66%	-0.19%

Volatility

TRMIX vs. FASPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund Class I (TRMIX) is 3.60%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M (FASPX) has a volatility of 4.27%. This indicates that TRMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRMIX	FASPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	4.27%	-0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.51%	11.92%	-1.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.11%	17.00%	-2.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.33%	20.68%	-1.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.70%	22.01%	-2.31%

TRMIX vs. FASPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRMIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than FASPX's 1.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRMIX vs. FASPX - Dividend Comparison

TRMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than FASPX's 7.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASPX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class M	7.72%	9.32%	0.00%	2.40%	1.93%	7.80%	0.55%	4.98%	15.67%	7.26%	21.61%	0.80%
TRMIX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund Class I	4.88%	5.64%	14.38%	7.86%	14.24%	9.34%	1.15%	4.40%	12.30%	6.71%	6.92%	11.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRMIX and FASPX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, TRMIX and FASPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TRMIX or FASPX?

FASPX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to TRMIX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMIX dropped -39.39% vs FASPX's -70.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.