TRMCX vs. FMPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX).
TRMCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 28, 1996. FMPAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 13, 2007.
Performance
TRMCX vs. FMPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRMCX vs. FMPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 3.51% | 10.55% | 16.21% | 18.99% | -4.16% | 24.51% | 9.84% | 19.59% | -10.66% | 11.59% |
FMPAX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A | 3.43% | 12.75% | 14.22% | 22.18% | -10.89% | 33.60% | 0.68% | 23.19% | -19.16% | 16.73% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TRMCX having a 3.51% return and FMPAX slightly lower at 3.43%. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX has outperformed FMPAX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while FMPAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.65% annualized return.
TRMCX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
FMPAX
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- 3.43%
- 6M
- 8.04%
- 1Y
- 21.86%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRMCX vs. FMPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRMCX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FMPAX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRMCX vs. FMPAX — Risk / Return Rank
TRMCX
FMPAX
TRMCX vs. FMPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRMCX | FMPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 1.04 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.58 | -0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.22 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.55 | -0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 6.29 | -1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRMCX | FMPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.04 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.51 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.46 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.37 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRMCX and FMPAX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRMCX vs. FMPAX - Dividend Comparison
TRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, more than FMPAX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 9.17% | 9.49% | 14.20% | 7.65% | 13.92% | 9.22% | 3.79% | 4.25% | 12.13% | 6.58% | 6.74% | 11.39% |
FMPAX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A | 7.56% | 8.24% | 10.38% | 0.96% | 13.09% | 1.08% | 1.78% | 1.61% | 14.62% | 8.77% | 1.11% | 4.99% |
Drawdowns
TRMCX vs. FMPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRMCX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum FMPAX drawdown of -63.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMCX and FMPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRMCX | FMPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -63.15% | +7.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -14.74% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.60% | -23.79% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.41% | -45.47% | +6.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | -7.72% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -9.80% | +3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 3.64% | +0.07% |
Volatility
TRMCX vs. FMPAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) is 5.95%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class A (FMPAX) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that TRMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRMCX | FMPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 6.56% | -0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 12.11% | -1.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.85% | 21.59% | -1.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 20.12% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 21.06% | -1.41% |