TRLUX vs. AVERX
TRLUX (T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class) and AVERX (Ave Maria Value Focused Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. TRLUX is actively managed, while AVERX is passively managed. Over the past year, TRLUX returned 28.31% vs 13.36% for AVERX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRLUX charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for AVERX.
Performance
TRLUX vs. AVERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRLUX achieves a 17.30% return, which is significantly higher than AVERX's 11.57% return.
TRLUX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 17.30%
- 6M
- 16.96%
- 1Y
- 28.31%
- 3Y*
- 17.04%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
AVERX
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 13.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRLUX vs. AVERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRLUX T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 17.30% | 14.85% |
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund | 11.57% | 0.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRLUX and AVERX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2025 | 0.51 |
The correlation between TRLUX and AVERX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRLUX vs. AVERX — Risk / Return Rank
TRLUX
AVERX
TRLUX vs. AVERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class (TRLUX) and Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRLUX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.12 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 0.97 | +3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.82 | 2.63 | +13.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRLUX vs. AVERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRLUX drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, which is greater than AVERX's maximum drawdown of -13.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLUX and AVERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRLUX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -13.20% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.02% | -13.20% | +6.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -13.20% | +12.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -5.91% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 4.84% | -2.99% |
Volatility
TRLUX vs. AVERX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class (TRLUX) is 3.80%, while Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that TRLUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRLUX | AVERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.80% | 5.22% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.67% | 14.63% | -5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.19% | 19.54% | -8.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.89% | 18.92% | -4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.97% | 18.92% | -2.95% |
TRLUX vs. AVERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRLUX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than AVERX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRLUX vs. AVERX - Dividend Comparison
TRLUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.86%, more than AVERX's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVERX Ave Maria Value Focused Fund | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRLUX T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class | 10.86% | 12.74% | 8.27% | 8.22% | 19.09% | 3.04% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRLUX and AVERX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVERX has higher volatility (5.22%) compared to TRLUX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLUX dropped -18.06% vs AVERX's -13.20%.
TRLUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRLUX and AVERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer