TRLIX vs. LOMAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TRLIX (TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund) and LOMAX (Edgar Lomax Value Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TRLIX returned 11.15%/yr vs 10.56%/yr for LOMAX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRLIX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOMAX.

Performance

TRLIX vs. LOMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX) and Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRLIX achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than LOMAX's 8.88% return. Over the past 10 years, TRLIX has outperformed LOMAX with an annualized return of 11.15%, while LOMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.56% annualized return.

TRLIX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 6M: 11.73%
• 1Y: 25.23%
• 3Y*: 18.57%
• 5Y*: 11.05%
• 10Y*: 11.15%

LOMAX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 8.88%
• 6M: 9.94%
• 1Y: 24.13%
• 3Y*: 16.33%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: 10.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLIX vs. LOMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRLIX TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund	10.74%	17.44%	14.79%	14.35%	-7.03%	27.10%	3.59%	28.83%	-14.29%	10.89%
LOMAX Edgar Lomax Value Fund	8.88%	18.09%	10.29%	5.19%	-0.46%	25.80%	-5.77%	23.27%	-3.31%	19.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TRLIX and LOMAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2002	0.93

The correlation between TRLIX and LOMAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TRLIX vs. LOMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLIX

TRLIX Risk / Return Rank: 71
TRLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
TRLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
TRLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
TRLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
TRLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

LOMAX

LOMAX Risk / Return Rank: 79
LOMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
LOMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
LOMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 60
LOMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
LOMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLIX vs. LOMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX) and Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRLIX	LOMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.42	2.54	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.42	3.74	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.43	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.56	5.11	-1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.34	16.90	-2.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRLIX vs. LOMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the LOMAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLIX and LOMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRLIX	LOMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.42	2.54	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.72	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.64	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.40	+0.10

Drawdowns

TRLIX vs. LOMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLIX drawdown since its inception was -61.94%, which is greater than LOMAX's maximum drawdown of -57.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLIX and LOMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRLIX	LOMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.94%	-57.82%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.35%	-4.86%	-2.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.69%	-11.93%	-2.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.13%	-17.50%	-2.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.54%	-37.81%	-0.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	-1.74%	+1.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-9.40%	+0.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.82%	1.47%	+0.35%

Volatility

TRLIX vs. LOMAX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund (TRLIX) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX) at 2.66%. This indicates that TRLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRLIX	LOMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.02%	2.66%	+0.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.29%	6.95%	+1.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.83%	9.76%	+1.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.92%	13.23%	+1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.05%	16.50%	+1.55%

TRLIX vs. LOMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLIX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than LOMAX's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRLIX vs. LOMAX - Dividend Comparison

TRLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.97%, more than LOMAX's 5.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LOMAX Edgar Lomax Value Fund	5.82%	6.34%	6.27%	4.66%	7.73%	5.11%	12.52%	2.16%	15.97%	8.80%	2.68%	15.54%
TRLIX TIAA-CREF Large Cap Value Fund	7.97%	8.82%	4.01%	8.58%	6.13%	9.19%	1.89%	2.08%	12.82%	5.19%	4.29%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRLIX and LOMAX in my portfolio?

TRLIX and LOMAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRLIX or LOMAX?

TRLIX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to LOMAX (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLIX dropped -61.94% vs LOMAX's -57.82%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LOMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.