PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LOMAX vs. RWMGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LOMAX vs. RWMGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX) and American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LOMAX achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly higher than RWMGX's 5.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LOMAX has underperformed RWMGX with an annualized return of 10.54%, while RWMGX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.18% annualized return.


LOMAX

1D
-0.79%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
8.76%
6M
10.66%
1Y
24.57%
3Y*
16.29%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.54%

RWMGX

1D
-0.29%
1M
1.84%
YTD
5.60%
6M
6.23%
1Y
18.11%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
12.17%
10Y*
13.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LOMAX vs. RWMGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LOMAX
Edgar Lomax Value Fund
8.76%18.09%10.29%5.19%-0.46%25.80%-5.77%23.27%-3.31%19.52%
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
5.60%17.56%19.35%17.58%-8.17%28.84%8.02%25.78%-5.91%20.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LOMAX and RWMGX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between LOMAX and RWMGX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LOMAX vs. RWMGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LOMAX
LOMAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LOMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
LOMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

RWMGX
RWMGX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
RWMGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RWMGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
RWMGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RWMGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
RWMGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LOMAX vs. RWMGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX) and American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LOMAXRWMGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.54

1.82

+0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.73

2.60

+1.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.33

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.16

2.28

+2.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.15

9.91

+7.24

LOMAX vs. RWMGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LOMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the RWMGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LOMAX and RWMGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LOMAXRWMGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

1.82

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.87

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.81

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.82

-0.43

Drawdowns

LOMAX vs. RWMGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LOMAX drawdown since its inception was -57.82%, which is greater than RWMGX's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LOMAX and RWMGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LOMAXRWMGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.82%

-34.64%

-23.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-8.35%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.93%

-14.61%

+2.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.50%

-18.46%

+0.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.81%

-34.64%

-3.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-0.29%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.40%

-3.12%

-6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

1.92%

-0.46%

Volatility

LOMAX vs. RWMGX - Volatility Comparison

Edgar Lomax Value Fund (LOMAX) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6 (RWMGX) at 2.41%. This indicates that LOMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RWMGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LOMAXRWMGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

2.41%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

7.90%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

10.33%

-0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.23%

14.10%

-0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

16.33%

+0.17%

LOMAX vs. RWMGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LOMAX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than RWMGX's 0.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

LOMAX vs. RWMGX - Dividend Comparison

LOMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, less than RWMGX's 9.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LOMAX
Edgar Lomax Value Fund
5.83%6.34%6.27%4.66%7.73%5.11%12.52%2.16%15.97%8.80%2.68%15.54%
RWMGX
American Funds Washington Mutual Investors Fund Class R-6
9.86%10.36%10.36%6.42%6.63%6.33%3.35%6.91%4.67%7.52%6.66%6.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


LOMAX and RWMGX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LOMAX has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to RWMGX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LOMAX dropped -57.82% vs RWMGX's -34.64%.

LOMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LOMAX and RWMGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer