TRLGX vs. TSBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX).
TRLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 2001. TSBIX is managed by TIAA Investments.
Performance
TRLGX vs. TSBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRLGX vs. TSBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | -11.46% | 17.51% | 37.57% | 46.22% | -35.26% | 23.24% | 39.57% | 28.51% | 4.35% | 37.77% |
TSBIX TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class | -0.18% | 8.69% | 3.32% | 6.05% | -14.43% | -1.03% | 7.43% | 8.94% | 0.08% | 4.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRLGX achieves a -11.46% return, which is significantly lower than TSBIX's -0.18% return. Over the past 10 years, TRLGX has outperformed TSBIX with an annualized return of 16.72%, while TSBIX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.17% annualized return.
TRLGX
- 1D
- 3.95%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- -11.46%
- 6M
- -10.30%
- 1Y
- 12.15%
- 3Y*
- 22.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 16.72%
TSBIX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.74%
- YTD
- -0.18%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 4.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRLGX vs. TSBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRLGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than TSBIX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRLGX vs. TSBIX — Risk / Return Rank
TRLGX
TSBIX
TRLGX vs. TSBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRLGX | TSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 1.15 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 1.64 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 2.12 | -1.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 6.29 | -4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRLGX | TSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.15 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.12 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.45 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.56 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRLGX and TSBIX is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TRLGX vs. TSBIX - Dividend Comparison
TRLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.46%, more than TSBIX's 4.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund | 15.46% | 13.69% | 9.80% | 2.04% | 3.88% | 2.56% | 0.42% | 4.09% | 7.93% | 9.27% | 1.64% | 4.71% |
TSBIX TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class | 4.34% | 5.38% | 5.10% | 3.77% | 2.31% | 1.69% | 4.56% | 3.68% | 2.63% | 2.45% | 3.19% | 2.89% |
Drawdowns
TRLGX vs. TSBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRLGX drawdown since its inception was -55.56%, which is greater than TSBIX's maximum drawdown of -19.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLGX and TSBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRLGX | TSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.56% | -19.21% | -36.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.18% | -2.82% | -15.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.44% | -19.21% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.44% | -19.21% | -21.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.94% | -2.17% | -12.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.71% | -3.58% | -5.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.43% | 0.95% | +4.48% |
Volatility
TRLGX vs. TSBIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) has a higher volatility of 7.19% compared to TIAA-CREF Core Impact Bond Fund Institutional Class (TSBIX) at 1.50%. This indicates that TRLGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRLGX | TSBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.19% | 1.50% | +5.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.51% | 2.52% | +9.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.17% | 4.32% | +17.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 5.80% | +16.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 4.83% | +16.90% |