TRLGX vs. RUSG.L

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L).

TRLGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 31, 2001. RUSG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Net Index. It was launched on Oct 27, 2011.

Performance

TRLGX vs. RUSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TRLGX vs. RUSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund	-10.29%	17.51%	37.57%	46.22%	-35.26%	23.24%	39.57%	28.51%	4.35%	37.77%
RUSG.L Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	24.09%	43.28%	-30.45%	29.15%	38.14%	35.28%	-2.66%	30.31%

Returns By Period

TRLGX

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -4.64%
• YTD: -10.29%
• 6M: -9.55%
• 1Y: 19.32%
• 3Y*: 22.77%
• 5Y*: 9.88%
• 10Y*: 16.88%

RUSG.L

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLGX vs. RUSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RUSG.L's 0.19% expense ratio.

TRLGX

T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund

RUSG.L

Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

TRLGX vs. RUSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLGX

TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 17
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLGX vs. RUSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) and Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF (RUSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRLGX	RUSG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.58	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.80	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.59	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRLGX	RUSG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.44	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.78	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between TRLGX and RUSG.L is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TRLGX vs. RUSG.L - Dividend Comparison

TRLGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.26%, while RUSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TRLGX T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund	15.26%	13.69%	9.80%	2.04%	3.88%	2.56%	0.42%	4.09%	7.93%	9.27%	1.64%	4.71%
RUSG.L Lyxor Russell 1000 Growth UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	TRLGX	RUSG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.56%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.44%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.81%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.71%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.57%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TRLGX	RUSG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.18%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.18%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.39%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.72%	—	—