PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRLAX vs. PRDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRLAX vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund (TRLAX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRLAX achieves a 4.81% return, which is significantly lower than PRDGX's 7.88% return.


TRLAX

1D
-0.84%
1M
0.10%
YTD
4.81%
6M
4.35%
1Y
12.19%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*

PRDGX

1D
-0.61%
1M
1.12%
YTD
7.88%
6M
6.69%
1Y
16.52%
3Y*
15.38%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
13.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLAX vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund
4.81%10.92%8.74%12.89%-16.59%10.45%13.48%19.08%-4.95%5.22%
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.88%14.74%13.48%13.68%-10.22%26.03%13.92%31.76%-1.06%8.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TRLAX and PRDGX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2017

0.86

The correlation between TRLAX and PRDGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRLAX vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLAX
TRLAX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TRLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

PRDGX
PRDGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PRDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLAX vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund (TRLAX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRLAXPRDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.31

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.37

+0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.20

9.71

+2.49

TRLAX vs. PRDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRLAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the PRDGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLAX and PRDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRLAX vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLAX drawdown since its inception was -23.82%, smaller than the maximum PRDGX drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLAX and PRDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRLAXPRDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.82%

-49.79%

+25.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.70%

-7.34%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.86%

-14.15%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.46%

-19.31%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.79%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-5.41%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.16%

1.79%

-0.63%

Volatility

TRLAX vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund (TRLAX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) have volatilities of 2.93% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRLAXPRDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

2.82%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.25%

7.69%

-1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.52%

9.87%

-2.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.88%

14.07%

-5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.76%

15.85%

-6.09%

TRLAX vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLAX has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than PRDGX's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRLAX vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison

TRLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, more than PRDGX's 7.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRDGX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc.
7.50%8.02%4.66%2.78%3.81%2.00%1.03%2.33%3.67%1.82%3.07%7.57%
TRLAX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Income 2020 Fund
8.70%8.08%8.38%6.52%7.29%7.77%7.93%5.80%7.83%2.84%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRLAX and PRDGX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRLAX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to PRDGX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLAX dropped -23.82% vs PRDGX's -49.79%.

TRLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRLAX and PRDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer