TRIRX vs. NHMRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Large Cap Growth Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIRX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX).
TRIRX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. NHMRX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jun 6, 1999.
Performance
TRIRX vs. NHMRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRIRX vs. NHMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIRX Nuveen Large Cap Growth Index Fund Retirement Class | -9.84% | 18.13% | 32.98% | 42.30% | -29.41% | 27.32% | 38.06% | 35.98% | -1.91% | 28.50% |
NHMRX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 0.08% | 3.24% | 5.62% | 7.31% | -14.96% | 10.37% | 3.25% | 12.59% | 2.06% | 12.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIRX achieves a -9.84% return, which is significantly lower than NHMRX's 0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, TRIRX has outperformed NHMRX with an annualized return of 16.25%, while NHMRX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.73% annualized return.
TRIRX
- 1D
- 3.75%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -9.84%
- 6M
- -9.45%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 12.07%
- 10Y*
- 16.25%
NHMRX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- 1Y
- 2.82%
- 3Y*
- 4.31%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRIRX vs. NHMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRIRX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than NHMRX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRIRX vs. NHMRX — Risk / Return Rank
TRIRX
NHMRX
TRIRX vs. NHMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Large Cap Growth Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIRX) and Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRIRX | NHMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 0.43 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 0.61 | +0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.12 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 0.60 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.24 | 1.44 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRIRX | NHMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 0.43 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.20 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.56 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.88 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIRX and NHMRX is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TRIRX vs. NHMRX - Dividend Comparison
TRIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, less than NHMRX's 6.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIRX Nuveen Large Cap Growth Index Fund Retirement Class | 4.60% | 4.15% | 3.00% | 1.67% | 10.58% | 8.44% | 1.69% | 2.13% | 3.69% | 0.68% | 1.09% | 1.31% |
NHMRX Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund | 6.20% | 6.54% | 5.79% | 7.34% | 5.64% | 5.09% | 5.03% | 5.39% | 5.47% | 5.38% | 5.88% | 5.60% |
Drawdowns
TRIRX vs. NHMRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIRX drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than NHMRX's maximum drawdown of -45.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIRX and NHMRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIRX | NHMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.49% | -45.45% | -6.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.32% | -7.92% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.82% | -21.52% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.82% | -22.22% | -10.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.18% | -2.42% | -10.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.93% | -5.35% | -1.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 3.28% | +1.48% |
Volatility
TRIRX vs. NHMRX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Large Cap Growth Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIRX) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund (NHMRX) at 1.87%. This indicates that TRIRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NHMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRIRX | NHMRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 1.87% | +4.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.39% | 2.75% | +9.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.63% | 8.04% | +14.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.50% | 6.81% | +14.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.05% | 6.71% | +14.34% |